THE LICENSING COURT.
[Before B. Ward, (ehairmkn), and Mmim.: Ferguson, Moniad, an&,l)alrymple, ; ' • THE BOYAIi HOT*^ *"' : ! John OkJta^iw B?t^h»Ur, made per-. sdnai application^ for -a, renewal of ' w license for tae Boyal Hotel?.. :, -. - ■■ The Chairman asked ifr the applicant wisheda ten or an eleven o'clock license,. aY that was not:! specified: m the. appli-^ cation. 1-. , :■'..,. .■■.-., -. ;.;.., .\t& Mr. Bfttchehir- stated" -tliaV;MHUartt/ license was.frr.- eleven <£clpck, and thtt. -license wa^ask^d'ttfthatehotu^u ai.;^ ;.- .-: .•- --'4 Granted. ,, .- 3 % ....--: . '-- THB'dBABBNBOBti BpifßL.Oi i :>/; James Carroll applied^ persbna-Uy fos» a renewal of his eleren o clock licen**. for the ne^t,ye»r v ;, iK; ; ; ', tuff/ •■■ [©ranteid. "" ' " '. "- " ''*'": ' ' . ' ' ' T80Ui^81K0M5 V^0TM,;... ..,;., ;.,,,-^..i - William fiearcls madß^plipatipn for- • a renew al of the abore-named hotel. ;! ;iGprantedCWJ.j-;:n •;•.-£■.-■.■/;: fj.:i .^ / ;i^.- ■■;■.. .. .-w--. ' ■-"■'- THE Pi-MUBSTOW HOTBI. Ghristiaw-Lindgren, ,made ; applicatiQa. . JFora license fortiie JPalmersten &<*& r The applicinewasSrepreiented by Mp. S Prior, and Mr. Hawkins ' appeared -oa *-. behalf of Mr; Jqsephj^aaan.: - ?The first na^rned gentleman spoke high\j as-to siutabUihf .% of Iha applicant, pointing oat the ad mirable manner m which Jbhe^hpusehau*-, been managed^ since^ 'it U^d Keen under his control, and dreecting the attention fto the veryanflttentiallY ?iga«d^petitjoa which had^been^rebetrel f i*ok- the ttitepayers m the imn»pdi»t«!^#?^- " ' " $fc Hawldj^ feliowed^ Urging rvgox^ the Bench the necessity vqf * hoeseni: . I house m the neighborhood, and producing elaborate plans ior ; the:ere*twn of A ; and suJistenti^^ttild;^. S? *M*
informed- the Bench that he was afethb'riied on Mr. Nathan* behalf, to' giro a written guarantee 1 / should the' license be granted, to have the plans altered m any way which the Bench, might «ugInspector Gobdall opposed the granting of the lioenie, jwliich he looked upon not as : but a fresh applica-r tion. . . ; ■■'• -. ;i > The Chairman did not. hold that opinion ; it was an application hy a n»Tr person for- an ! house, ; - /0 ; : ' ' Inspector GoodalLdidi not view tht matter Jn, that light. However, he would oppose the granting upon. the grounds!' thafc.it/had been -a -harbor- forbad characters, and was totally unprqvided with, accpmnaodatiouia I ~.C L ." l Ji : Mr. Hawkins, , said tha, J; ,?nch, unac* caution ai that the house' had' not been ireil kept, took him>;c6mp\«tielT .by .surprise, ai the applioant had had no notice of such obiecfcion ; beside which nMelfc quit* ; ;- ■u?e'|t^couMj not he, sustained. Mr. Lindgren .".yak well;^awnir^.Pal, Hierstoni indhe^XMxVHa^ins^asjßertod, that no; cbmplainta\ coulCbe f sustained against the hens© 'while it had ,beeu , 'VTBnier his control...: -. ,. ..... , .. v ; v» Mr. Priqif reiterated^the> ohser^atipni : of Mr. Hawkins, aiicl added;that it, was,| not for the Bench to c'onsiderwhat had teem the -chuta'cter of'the'Kouse itith© past, but rather yjha.thad^been'th^cojiduct of the present landlord. - •■ The Chairman admitfedJTthlr truth r of , the remarks oiiconnseT,. «ut--eTeii supposing that vthe charges* were- : again;st Mr. LindgrenV instead of ; iorjthey' could not be?entertftined hy j i^vTßench, inasmuch as the Adt ha.dnoti been c'omplied.;with^by, ; fornifhin^,.the: applicant with ,^i wntten tt^ievgfijifi oft the nature of the/pbiection*, .-,» ; .y, ,-j. ■;«> The C^njmissio^.ers,, then retirad-.fqr; consultation, and after about half an \ hour's deliberation^returned into Court, . . v hen «■■'? h ''' h'V ,;' ' ' ' ' ; - : ' : ' ':' lßsp*etor : * : 66<>'d^U^.jpi6ixiited out that any application- v inad.a should be, for ..^a new lieinse; inasinu'eh as the old license had lapsed on the 3rd of. 1^; The former licensee ihadWcome an' insolvent; md the Court had. ;gramte,d: pe^misjjioni to Mr. Lindgren to.take^pharge for the Trustee. The^eXonlj gavelibeVty for three months,- -and those three months ended on tbe 3rd ef ,May;,^ ,. . L ' ,' The Chairman agreed'withi'tlie Inspeptor, but sfcrted th^v^he ■ decision of the Court was to refuse the license on the grounds^tbat'there was, no accommodation, fl-nd? that a licensed house required m that part of the town.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT18800605.2.12
Bibliographic details
Manawatu Times, Volume IV, Issue 45, 5 June 1880, Page 2
Word Count
575THE LICENSING COURT. Manawatu Times, Volume IV, Issue 45, 5 June 1880, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.