Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ROUGH ON THE OLD MAN.

I am not of a religious turn of mind, and there aye many com.nanda both m and beyond the Decalogue, to the non-observance of which I must nleud guilty ; but m the respect and veneration I hold for; hoary locks and aged limsi3, I will yield to no man. This commendable trait was the outcome of a perusaVin my juvenile days of the frightful fate allotted to some larrikins of by-gone ages m .punishment for scoffing at an individual whose cranium was innocent of capillary covering. These, .1 say; were the sentiments impressed upon my youthful mind, and although sufficient time has not. elapsed since then to warrant my claim for -veneration, I find the present generation hold very different ideas upon the question.* Youthful gentlemen who are lucky enough to possess fathers— the said fathers being allowed to bear their son's names — are particularly careful that no good deed of the "junior" shall be attributed to the "senior." Thus it is that alt hough we are repeatedly hearingof John Smith, junior ; George Jones, junior}; or James Brown, junior ; the elderly Smiths, Browns, and Joneses are always studiously kept m the background. It has always been a mutter of wonder to '■■ mV 1 why those of that ilk-should be so punctilious about the juvenile affix, wben the party claiming seniority was totally unknown. Indeed it is somewhnt remarkable that m proportion as the "juniors " ncqu'-re notoriety, the unfortunate "seniors" become buried benea.th a mountain of obscurity. Everyoue has henrd of nhe Bunedm Whittington. H. S. Fish, junior ; and Georsre Jones, junioi' w of Privilege' notoriety, but how ttnnv are aware of thf existence or persritinlit.v of Jones pare ?• Of course, one conH easily und<?i'«tnnd it. if either of the gentlemen were a Pitt, a Pliny, or a Dumas ; but as neither of tlio paternal? seem- to have startled the world by their brilliancy, it is scarcely filial to condemn the aged nart'es by snob inviting contrast. Think of it, H. S., and beware of coming retribution at the hands of Fishes yet ulnspawned."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT18791119.2.5.3

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Times, Volume III, Issue 93, 19 November 1879, Page 2

Word Count
348

ROUGH ON THE OLD MAN. Manawatu Times, Volume III, Issue 93, 19 November 1879, Page 2

ROUGH ON THE OLD MAN. Manawatu Times, Volume III, Issue 93, 19 November 1879, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert