Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

~£Ss? PALMERSTON NORTH. ■t-TMhsday, September 19th, 1878. (Bb'fo^^. Ward, Esq., R.M., his Worship and V. Monrad, Esq., J.P.) H! / J§feBAOH OF THE STAMP ACT. .... Chajfes Walker was fined £1 and costs ~;ft»£*ffmng a receipt for £3 without having affixed a stamp thereto. O-BSCENB lAWOtTAQB. Peter Andersen complained against Mac* thri^DahtWffirtHat"ine aidrbn the 9thl3eptember, use indecent »and insolJidg languagetojjiajrifj^ ylyi^lnf^ fcftfiftrnft,gnhfTftHftßvpter and cause a breach, of the- peace. ' : 'There" was" a cross-tumraona. brought by ; defendant, and.MrStaite, who appeared fqs Anderseni, suggested t hat th© eji4pttpe,Jislcon might serve- for both cases. " "" " "' . . A rniwiber of .'witnesses-; jrere; examined througbi Mf Jemsep^andiaart^ evidenceproved that both parties were to.blame, : th# Bench fined Dalstrom £2,. with £2 lla, 6d costs, and Andersen £1, with 11$ 6d costs. •!•»-./■■ . iTJKBBarSTBBBb'iJOiQi'- ' ; • ' ' r - Robert Buchnich ' - was* htfo^med^againsS by the Dog Inspector for having an unregis- : tered dog inhia posseWdn- on. the 29th of Augusj;. . pefendant , denied^ thf- oornerjiig of the at^rnal, but: as .Constable Gillespie ; proved pqßsessioß, r the '^niWjiifp, fine of Is and costs was imposed.' ' ,'. ... _ „.,.. a •'•'./' •■KbriA'tra'a!,;* p»toe_tebe; ' Frank Kroupa,,oooy : 'abo\it twelve years of age> J Mi:as complained" a'gKmat by Fritz Jenssen with having stolen a fruit tree from his garden^ ;Aceused-:waSi'a!Bewßboy, incS while delivering .a, paper, took to uproot and ca^ry .away' the 'tree. "Mr jensBen said he did not wish to press the charge, _ and -would be- quite satisfied if the Beach would ad minister a 1 B(e9er^cauS6n.; Kroupa had nothing to Bay,"anclX ( on3 i eal)le- ! GTllsdpie r i was ordered to' give him four strokes with : a whip. "\ '.! !T !) '/: CITII. CAST». • Kenneth Qampbelly.Wmiam^Oabonie:— Claim, £35, damages, for the (fcstruction o£ a Taluable;dpg.;[jßir Staite. appeared for the plaint^ffj but.as itappear.Bd : in > evidenqe.tha^ the dog had hot been registered, the Bench held that jit vtasJatal^tp plaiatME'Bj case, and dismissed it with costs, £2". 'Mr St'axte took exception to the ruling, and asked the Magis* trate to state- a case. Mr Ward declined" fif dp so, and counsel thereupon gave notice of appeall ?{ rs i . Hpwlett tfe MpGrath v.^&tryey .& SfeGolh —Claim, £42 4s 23. Mr Sfi3^foFtt&-ae-fendants. Plaintiffs non-suited, with costa. Edrtvardl BrightjweliYv. Warena;^Cli4m. > £8 0s 3d. Judgment, ez parte. Edward^ Brigh^well r./Ar«,ma Karaka. — Claim, £3' l7s 7d. Judgment for plantiff With, Q05t5.|. ,,,,., ■, ; r.-.y -;-•„• •- . -r. Thomas Moffatt v. Andrew Tourseh.— Claim, £1 lls 9di ' Judgfnenfc^ ■'«& parte; - ". Edward ßrightwellVi Hori ßepp.-^Clahnf £•1 la sd. Mr ; Staite appeared : forAhe ; de* . fence, And pleaded not. indebted. Counsel 'further showed,/by ;a ( b6ok, product thfit; sbme items sajdto be supplied to. defendant had not been entered; m ,the day-boqk, or, charged tq, the : account, And consequently.' was calculated to throw discredit upon their' oojrecti^ss. Jfudgment for plaintiff, witli costs. Rosinsky and Powell y. Claim, £15 12s. Mr ! Stait'e appeared for the defence, and' oh f:! betelf of his client, paid £9 8s 6d into Court,, the- remainder of the claim' being considered excessive: ' Judgment for defendant. •'' . /.'" .i. Mi Dillon v. iJohn Maysmor. — Claim^. £7 Is 9d for rail 3 cut and deh'vered. Me.Staite f appeared for the . defendant, and urged 'as a defence' thai thij fiad 1 n6t bden. cut according to the " dimensions contraefeel' for. Several /hss ; b[6en ;-sent( to Wqmgoehu, and were rejected. Thereupon Mr Mays>^ mor notified W the plain«lifß,nehai hiJwould not have anympre, of- the s^qe nature. They took no notice of the order, and carried oufr, the coj\tracfc, ■ the ipraaeni fchvini being macfe therefor. It appeared, sx.a«Mjewe jlliat a].' thougli a' portion of tlrosb supplie'di -vviere rbjected, the defendant , had paid for , them. Judgment was reserved .until the nest sitting of the Court.' : v " ' ••■.':■■ Mackie and ir.' "El -Fuller. This was a judgment summons to recover £4 17s. Def en daiit did not : aappearr r > «bd ■ an- ■ ordeii ; was. made forthwith ' f or. amount* withi costs, m default, ten days iii Wanganui gaoL

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT18780921.2.13

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Times, Volume III, Issue 99, 21 September 1878, Page 2

Word Count
627

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Manawatu Times, Volume III, Issue 99, 21 September 1878, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Manawatu Times, Volume III, Issue 99, 21 September 1878, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert