Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WINNING THE WAR

BUDGETARY BURDENS. CHANCELLOR’S HINT. SUBSTANTIAL CLAIMS. (United Press Association —By Electric Telegraph.—Copyright.) (British Official Wireless.) Received May 2, 11.20 a.m. RUGB Y, May 1. In asking ike House of Commons to give its approval for the Budget resolution relating to the proposed purchase tax, the Chancellor of the Exchequer (Sir John Simon) said that on the second reading of the Bill, which he hoped to present in the form which had been discussed with trade associations, the House would have a full opportunity of examining the scheme, which was something new in Britain’s armoury ol taxation.

The sales taxes, said the Chancellor, existed in many parts of the world and had been- applied with success in the British Dominions. He explained the reasons for his decision to impose the tax at the point between the wholesaler and the retailor, and dealt with the exemption to be accorded to food, drink, fuel, and public utilities services. He thought it would be necessary to include clothing, but promised to consider the views of the House.

They were engaged in a tremendous struggle, said Sir John, and it was essential to limit consumption. It was one of his main concerns and responsibilities when there were enormous additional demands for war purposes to keep down the demand put forward by civilians.

Replying to Opposition suggestions that the income tax on higher grades of income was not sufficiently severe, Sir John Simon warned the House that they would have to have recourse before they had done with the war to this instrument of taxation of incomes in a most formidable fashion. It was impossible to suppose it could operate only at one end of the scale. :Not in that way could large additional sums be secured.

Just as two-thirds of the whole consumption was by individuals getting £5 a week or less, so they must face the fact that there would have to be substantial claims —manv of them hard to bear—at the lower end of the scale, though he did not say the lowest ol all.

They must let the lowest of all hate such protection as thev con'd give them, because they bad so little. He. however, was sure the House and the country were, never going to fail to accept anv and every burden proposed so long as it was necessary to win the war.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19400502.2.75

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume LX, Issue 130, 2 May 1940, Page 9

Word Count
396

WINNING THE WAR Manawatu Standard, Volume LX, Issue 130, 2 May 1940, Page 9

WINNING THE WAR Manawatu Standard, Volume LX, Issue 130, 2 May 1940, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert