Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LEVEL CROSSINGS.

(To'the Editor.)

Sir, —The numerous accidents at level crossings—railway and highway — clearly indicate that the demand for eilicient automatic crossing keeper signals is painfully lacking. In this city electric bells and flashlights are placed at the sides of all the most dangerous railway crossings. These signals, while in action, certainly compel users of these particular crossings to “Look out for the engine,” hut n the approaching train seems to allow plenty of time for them to cross they, or at least many of them, do not hesitate to do so. 't he department, apparently, is quite aware of the inefficiency of these compulsory Stop signals as the engine-driver is to supplement them by the customary shriek of the engine's whistle. Pedestrian crossings, now being fitted with flashlight signals at each side of the street, are observed with mathematical precision, often to the point of stupidity. This is about the only word to express the position when all wheel traffic is held up waiting to cross, although no pedestrian he in sight. Most people, especially strangers, look tor obstructions aiid dangers directly in their path. Doubtless the authorities have a special reason lor erecting a signal at each side of the street when o.ne signal, placed in the middle of the street, would provide a much better service at half the cost. The absurdity of the railway level crossing signals can only he equalled by having two officers on point duty instead of one, and standing on t(ie street boundary, directing the .traffic with their backs glued to the fence. Doubtless the Railway Department lias a reason for maintaining such an inefficient system of protection against crossing accidents in preference to erecting an automatic crossing-keeper. At any rate, I think that the travelling public are entitled to some explanation as to wliy the department does not scrap the present obsolete system in favour of a common-sense automatic level cross-ing-keeper or its equivalent.—l am, Cto ” C. 11. MASON. April 24, 1940.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19400426.2.37.2

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume LX, Issue 125, 26 April 1940, Page 6

Word Count
331

LEVEL CROSSINGS. Manawatu Standard, Volume LX, Issue 125, 26 April 1940, Page 6

LEVEL CROSSINGS. Manawatu Standard, Volume LX, Issue 125, 26 April 1940, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert