Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Syme v. Rockstrow.

VERDICT FOR £200. |^ (UNITED PBtSS ASSOCIATION.) WEtttNGToisr,^^vtaeßday. _, A^t the Supreni?' Jßourt, Mrs, Syme, formerley\ v 6f Nelson, brourht an action •gaiftSt^J. F, Blickitrow, of Foxton, dilniM*^B6o0 daftiagesfor alleged nnikiltol treatment of a broken arm, »na loss, of^jservipe m conseqntnee. The / medical evidence went to show that the case was unsuccessfully treated. After a few minptes deliberation the jury gave a verdict for £200, on the grouud of defendant's neglect m. not setting the the-liinli at the tin Si.ofi .of the accident, and not,; calling medicil afterwards.: .' : . ■•■ ■ ; '-''.•■■ ; •

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18860609.2.22

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume XII, Issue 1729, 9 June 1886, Page 3

Word Count
89

Syme v. Rockstrow. Manawatu Standard, Volume XII, Issue 1729, 9 June 1886, Page 3

Syme v. Rockstrow. Manawatu Standard, Volume XII, Issue 1729, 9 June 1886, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert