The Right to Landed Property.
(To the Editor of the Woodville^Ee;v n Qm^B ot o rri j Sir, — As I obieryethat you are on ths war-path m the caoseibf «?rL*nd Nationalizaiion 1 ' aa they qsil it,-I beg to brinf tinder yorir* nbti<&*3|^ ihati /©f Jr®w<? readers some such considerations as th* following: — The establishment of th» principle that the right: to property m land m. New Zealand is less indefeasible thati the ijight tqf property of others desr-, criptions 4 tfbuld : be the greatest dflaU^ possible dißa,Bj:Qi#j;itof this ,Jt it" evident,, that if the Government may take 'Mr Rathbbhe*s property near.iWMpawa, they may also-take Mr Harding'* ;or Mr Sowry's*property near Wpodjdll« r or if we tdiffit ;that\one particialar A clalf of landt-aprgpertyj^j to be ; exeaipt from actual ,cqnfigcati9n tf it%;Talue wpuiaff jfidftf ' the less Be (iepfeciated or Wdeed'altd^t geter' destroyed ; '/fay -interference iwitUr > other classes of landed 'property. Moirt^ gagees would take the alarm, and moneyr i on landed security -would hardly bY obtainable at any price. That would . aooa mean for us a fall of 50 percent^' pr more m, the yalue of both rural 'and town*'land hare. You will sa-r it is no^ in^^ tended to take the land without givinr - *. c fnjr' Vontfpensatidn" for : it. We iw&r what that means. The " fair compjpisan' # tion"f is,' it is understood, to be based q% the property tiix valuation. The'prq!r T perty-taxyaluation is. made once m thfie years, and we know thatat'is not'b^J^ndl ' the bounds of possibility that land m thi» district; if left alohi by the land n4ti6Halizators inay,;at any ftmev'go apilQDi<Q»jr^ cent, m 'a mdnth or two. -This r^sa iat, value is 1 - what these fodlish theorists call : the " unearned increment," and' ig' what they think land owners may fflilfi be despoiled of._^l do not propose to go into tho.questioff whether it is earned or not earned,? bufcfbjßlp weirely ttfdrawypur attention".^ .^efaot— that* w^the \riain thing thjit^nine-teniths Vf vour^^SscSS bers have \o look- to end'theif^stragelwswitli adverse mar|% and to raise them to a position o^-JB§|PQ9dgnce_,and t per* haps, ofef^tnpetSnce. As to .thelimprp» babilit!^ ,^of>: tfie smaller settlers^pa^ interfered with.t that, is opem_to question if the gameS| opce"b*egun. The interests bf the wealcby^"knd influential aAhgensrally wqII l^wedTafter m our lhcorr^dblt ?Par v liMenOltiig the'weak aloni winb \. are m d^angerd^bßing victimisedAHow Miti Joy the way m thig-conntcfion, it irnayl)e asked^ha^n)i v qne haa'thought of imggmffi&Mfti^GfmiiSinmt should jresume possession of the Tamaki block, ■the mopping up; of a- year or two ago by two enterprising M.H-R.'s has limitedjifjnpt.altogether stifled the progjress x 4C -MfhSteverf SlleiiV : interfered with, 'we 'm a y be quite^'suH 'that that will be left alone. — I am, &0., > 7 V* Wn.iaDAM:WrG4KHLB.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18860329.2.12
Bibliographic details
Manawatu Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1670, 29 March 1886, Page 2
Word Count
444The Right to Landed Property. Manawatu Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1670, 29 March 1886, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.