Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Dilke Scandal.

; The decision m the' Dilke ©ase*V i« ' equivalent to the Scotch verdict, u Nok proven." No imporfcant witnesses were called except Grawfbrd himself, whojer. peated at 'full length, with; many appal* ling; details* his ; wife's confession of longcontinued adultry' with" 'Sir Charles Dilke. As his wife did not appear this i Was held to be co'hclusive against her but no legal evidence against Sir Charles Dilke. -(The Judge jsaid -that /he saw. ho i-easonifor. doubting Ihe trutli'of Craw, ford Vevidence, and was compelled ;^6 bometotEe cb'nclusi6n~that the adultery^ charged was conjlnitted. A painful ma. pression ..was pr*aueed # .m Court by Prawf orJ'k unffontraoUcted teißßmpny. follo^ by the- acquittal of Sir ggprt Dilke on . technical,^rpunds.^ 'Was resuit disap^oinjjs Sir Charles' Iriendt, who boped(to<see his innocence conclusively established. Sir .Charleiß* n^Xr»ppearafige.in%,«he'' witness-box to deny*olj oath the>a ! 6cußatiiDn against him was dv« to the/advice of his. counsel. The "press take ' various^ views of ,the trial, the Daily'Ntws aM^re%m^Zi regarding his ■vindication as sufficient. The Times thinks the Judge's decision.- singukp, ?•* grets that the* matters were" not probed to, the bottom, hints at its belief cif the guilt of t{ie ?co respondent; andldbnbti/ whether" : he° can hig'lpub'Ki career.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18860316.2.13

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1659, 16 March 1886, Page 2

Word Count
197

The Dilke Scandal. Manawatu Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1659, 16 March 1886, Page 2

The Dilke Scandal. Manawatu Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1659, 16 March 1886, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert