The Dilke-Crawford Divorce Case.
FQRTHER PARTICULARS.
AN UNSATISFACTORY TERMINATION.
(ELECTRIC TELRGRAPH. — COPYRIGHT, ) (SPEIAL TO UNITED PRESS ASSOCIATION.) London, Feb. 12. The divorce case Crawford v. Crawford has created a good deal of excitement, and the impression left on the: public mind is that the -facts contained m the allegation have not been d sproyod, but that the verdict obtained was simply a lagal acquittal. Mrs Crawford's admissions were unsupported, and complete evidence was not produced .by the petitioner's counsel. Acting on the advice of his counsel, Sir Chas. Dilke did not present himself for examination. The Times characterises the result, of this case as extraordinary, and the Pall Mall Gazette says that Sir Charles Dilke's promised refutation of the charges lias hot been given. 1 The marriage has been dissolved.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18860216.2.7
Bibliographic details
Manawatu Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1636, 16 February 1886, Page 2
Word Count
130The Dilke-Crawford Divorce Case. Manawatu Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1636, 16 February 1886, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in