Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Facts for Consideration.

Mr Cargill, m his presidential; address ; t6 the Dunedin Chamber of Commerce* m advocating intercolonial reciprocity, adduced the following facts : — " New Zealand last year produce.d 9;Q00$000 Jbushels of oats, and Victoria only 4,000,000, while Victoria -had J a, population of 931, 790, or nearly double our population. iThen the number of horses m Victoria was 286,779, as against 161,730 m New Zealand.. The product m New Zealand of oats was 32.1 bushels per acre. It must ■be perfectly plain, therefore, that Victoria could never possibly com- ! pete with New Zealand m the growth of oats— that we should always be able to -undersell them ; and he considered that the only difference there should be ;in the price of oats between the two colonies 'should , be the freight from New Zealand to Victoria. He was not well posted iup regarding prices, but he knew that the price of oats m Victoria was at one time 3s 6d per bushel, and tjja,t here the price was Is 6d — that there was a difference of no less than 2s. per bushel between the two colonies. With an interchange of products the price would naturally ; rise Is m this colony and be decreased Is m . Victoria' ;"An t d'th»t ; 'increase of Is per bushel 'would' mean something like half a'niillidh 'of money to New. ZeaMid. This was an astounding fact^{ft Voice :" AVhaJ; is thediity oiv p) If the A duty on oats lyasl! as. lie » was < , informed, 6d per busnet, that would mean a quarter of.a'milijon of money.; The South-; ■crn, portion .$ New Zealand was tremendously interested m this question, as one-half of the total quantity produced m this colony was grown iin Otago. •In what way, lie asked, could New Zealand suffer detriment ;by the proposed interchange of commodities ? We should be benefited |by the sale of our oats, barley, dairy produce, coal, timber, and other things, and a comparison of : these with the products we should get front Victoria would show clearly.that we had nothing whatever to fear from the ! proposed interchange^ biithad ! everything to gain."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18850302.2.26

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume IX, Issue 75, 2 March 1885, Page 4

Word Count
347

Facts for Consideration. Manawatu Standard, Volume IX, Issue 75, 2 March 1885, Page 4

Facts for Consideration. Manawatu Standard, Volume IX, Issue 75, 2 March 1885, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert