Legality of Wills.
\W*^ V"Dari^g the tjiti of an important '. '^U^fehewrd ill Nelson, yrhere.' re- - 'JferjQQg-: to pne\ law on the gubjepfc of revocation^ his Honor said that > it a man made a- will; and then madb a, d vse6odd)-<oiM, either by , a revocation ! ?cb^iweiorJby/;reaKon of the bequests ; ■ ', ib^mgLfidverae to the former one, ; the meoe destruction' or revocation of the second will -would not place the first \ - -ion' its legs again. It was enacted m •■i&ti^fitet ?est of the Queen that a first wi}l should "Btit be btou^ht into , force ;#f: a^i&ii i aflfcei* befni bh<& revoked, j & cept by • re-ekecntion or codicil^' - This is, of course, no news to ;;j the -'layers; bat' W are tinder* the ;impression that not a. .f^w | the profeuioh Believe that the^ dentraction, of a'iecond will reinstates a former v pne.ualess.it has .been actually torn up, burnt, or otherwise effectually,; - --put Out of exiitonoe. ' > , ''\
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18841113.2.19
Bibliographic details
Manawatu Standard, Volume VIII, Issue 131, 13 November 1884, Page 3
Word Count
150Legality of Wills. Manawatu Standard, Volume VIII, Issue 131, 13 November 1884, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in