Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A Judge on Press Libels.

Mi Justice; Inneai l & up tUe evidence m an actlori'foV^teages for alleged lip^-I^vis f. JMu?baidhe had no hesltftiibn id filing the jury tbajb tlie matters .which wer« spoken of, tflluded 'to; ahrf discassed ia. the two. paragi^pljs .before the Court were' of jiubficiiliterejlt, upon which not only the, proas had a right to comment, but every, member of the commupity had i a^ ) ea^a] (^h^ The/ all knew apdacl^pwJ^^feratefnlly the j^»3i%'^sß!^^ con * ducted, was aii enpriopjus^an^ an incalculable benefit . fKe wej£beiiig now when Dpbpdv m ha sens^eyer dreamed of controverting 'tn,a6 posi- otion. It was nob easy to estimate the advantages which deriveftrom a properly, conducted press, nor was it easy to estimate (he obligations of , gratitude under which the community laboiiTed to those . Vho'cpndi^t* the ;press. The* imatter a^ present^efore the Court was "oi^'of JP^^inferest, which would justijy. an/^r|ttl' w the public prei*s m discussing ffifrf and freely the afcts and <^4actTof the persons donceriieSd. fM ' T fepir-A8 tha niith^ was'.iidhered loMa^lruth; he nM not of necessity acc^icy m Syjittli : matter oNetail-^a^,^ writer cdnfinbd Wmf ti> Sj*> and alid I legitimarely I 'a^sini' ! 6ut 'ojfK —the writer or publiebef 'woulif nofc betubjectto an action for libel— no. uiattev bow severe the! anitoaivjiffsiott

or how unqualified the condemnation. raarth6 same time they must bear this m mind, that untruthful and unfounded statements must .not be made against individuals, and if they were made ; the writer was 'responsible. The question m thin instance was -whliher or not the - article was justified^ > whether thi» paro^aplis a f ajir, substantial, and truthful account; of the^cirenmstances of the case, or did they trausgres3 the bounds of fair and legitimate comment? If the paragraphs, did do so, the plaintiff was 1 f .entitled to damages ; but if they did not, the verdict would be for the defendants, f

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18841113.2.15

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume VIII, Issue 131, 13 November 1884, Page 2

Word Count
308

A Judge on Press Libels. Manawatu Standard, Volume VIII, Issue 131, 13 November 1884, Page 2

A Judge on Press Libels. Manawatu Standard, Volume VIII, Issue 131, 13 November 1884, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert