District Court.

Manawatu Standard, Volume IV, Issue 281, 24 October 1884, Page 3

District Court.

■ •:.••"■ . 1 l>i tlUi*Sji tS.fi ii.-ii (;,:' I ■••■. , [B*fyS9 iß^uP^Wf.rP^tity Judge, . . ''tytijQ'rii ißiWiSOtf.]. ■:.:■; j ;.:;.-. f! !:-(..; Bla'cMore .r^i^eldmg ] ■] Borough Conncil. , • ■•.-, v InKJaieV^^h^oh ' t>ehaflf .of thWp^RWff&pf%i^ ; "* rcheaVing. He application bathe^"ro.uticl that there. had been WisConce'p^ion ;"' ; d^ the' law 3 \*j;ifie'|jid^e";^ ;fa^as lie,', (Mr; Shaw^ 'waV abfe to |J&ssr, ' it appeared ' i that te^fc^hlia^non-^uHeit'the plaihSn^on^e'^und :' ; &! J ie'&&t^ that laevTeVpad 'Jb»eej»| no -iieglect on the pact oj(*"ihe'd(Bfendaiii Ciorpoi^ution' — -ainU inat'iW* special damages had been clainiea by - the, plaintiff." Mr { Han.t;iris lor . Uefendiiht yam that fneplaihtiff' h^ 1 bee^n'6h^riitoa : oil tlmtgaroiind^the case was. hot sent; Hf tjhaw'i' ft doeinot matter what the gi-ound was now. We propose to aVk Tour Houqr for a rule nisi : .^>r ajnew bn .the groftnd .bf vats-, divegj^x^ |o|fcti^ri. to;the/jtfr^;' I ami spea.lqng^ab a. disadvantage, not beiujsy n- ,jQouri accidental ' circiinjV apc^) r at r the jHearing;. , Whgttter^ therej waV^evideiice for th^ jury^^id/^|iet^r'J;lia|j;^ai8 ,a (JuestMin for Aejury.ia'wHat I wish'to 1 Of course, properly an application.- for a new tvi^l sjiQuld lie nmdefbn.' %X& day of hearing of^the' first 1 Ctlult , next'afwAbe^heann'gl'-'^at^woftlU put n^'^acft^o 'January nexti To < 'avolct expense' aiiicl' inconvenwnce to parties, ' if yonr Honor will sir ttt^ morroig^^jc^Un^Ql^or^efendantjwill" ' -waive any technical objection-/ wV inißß^ ha^ Ithe ; q6e^tion4 diticu3.sdd; and application for a Jiew trial made Mr Hankiim; (| jyill^ p9t consent, my witnesses have dispersed. It will be no advHntagerto pliihtiff niy assenting jto the cburi»e proposed. The if ittiSsses i s^ip^i°i^3 !l 'Wiit t"^ v e to «i>e paid m any f case^ , , . , '. . . , Mr ShawV'Whai wewiiih is to hay(B?s»Mrtoßi^r beJpreTttju^-lß^ this ciaae going to a..highei' Court oh conw,j»acjf^m before o> your llonor;; next Glonrt day. The aefendanib-nas got nothing to do withregard towit neßKes,jif^e ( mfttter!^ I*«r jcpfrid: be argued 1»-mprrow. .. Jf . a new trial wele grontM<*fter,farl(«n>.enfc-; tlie; CoiMftiniightifix the:^ h'«?«rirtg{?jfftr ..';^next • Co»rVdtf| whfia ithe.pariti^i, W/ou ld be., prepared with thj»ir; vwitnej^e)*.; t^Ke, only tek that the law. he argued tomoi^birpjafidutUe^ $i-A l nw ; -sna!,sqf granted the case .CQttld; be heard next Ja&SfHyr—T- : . . . His Honor : Would it not be cheafeK tMtfafaf ( the . case a tor /the Supreme Court at once 1 Mr Sha^uNo.} "We cannot expect to hawupdfn^ybhr jaioteH i all the. *yidence which was given. • It the matter goes ta^e SujPtreioe.<?ourt all that, we can get is an order that your Hsgp» ow,asrw^ng; jn, directing as. you di4 r ftn<J> tjeu fi %e. t ,(?a^e would" Hare, to g<fte&e}}W&*&sr aS^e^a^well k«ftwn^^b, ? .butsai-eLy a powerful a%4^wS^jiM^^SroTsJ*? 1 ?! , tl>e Cwpmtiw M9»^ M it ,tQV .thtei^egfin^nietjts,; ;Iv . <l/f , eßisJJouor : jOf*corursc r you.yiah. to, sl^ll.y^^ypwjiHipgly sib.^^rrojw .if -■■: „ „.,.u ; : , ,;. ,_.. )r .,, «JM*H«9kinß^ j: idQ ,nob consent. ; , . fjMl?) f§ha*i : :)^quusel; |or 4 dejentfant ifea4<i«B.Mm credit,,; r(i f u .y,. : \ ;,,,.;, ,_ « 3tt»/^*i^ ; ;; I W ; immoyable., ,.. O3^t-S^y ; ; /: TheiJ,ther^ is an. p»(J, oi of 1 ?!'." C^ u ffi!