Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PARLIAMENTARY.

HOUSE OF.EEPRESENTATIVES.

FRIDAY; OCTOBER 17. I

'WELLINGTON COLLEGE RESEIit-' 1 YES CONFIRMATION BILL. The local Bills Committee recommended m reference to this Bill that it bo allowed.to proceed, at the snrrio time, pointing oat that the Standing Orders had not been' " strictly complied: with. The evasion, however, was a' slight one. Dr Newman moved that the' Bill be read< a "second time oniThursday next. ; ; , Mr 'Ma'chrtlifur considered it junfair i ihftt the residents of a distfict interested . should not have had noti,ce ( of the riaea'srire,' and he' therefore 5 v Opposed tlie inptipn... , y-l { . , -f.-Oi -r' -./}' ; '.■;■/ ,' The Premier pointed out that'the resideuts ,of IPalmerston , ( North had ""evidently had opportunity of examining the Bill, inasmuch as they had presented a -petition to the House against it. . .Mr Steward . urged that the House should enforce the Standing Order. The Premier said that the House had overlooked an exactly 'similar defect m the" CKtfstctfuirch Market Reserves! Bill. Mr Shephard (chairman of Committee) • pointed out that the defect was purely . one of formality.,' and not of great import. The Bill. has been open for inspection at the Resident Magistrates 'Court, but the dates upon whjch it had 'beon deposited were not strictly jin accordance with tlie law' " : ' ", • ••Mr M«iearthursaid "the Bill-proposed .to grant .to the .Wellington College^ lands to v/hioh they had no right. ! Dr Newman, m reply, pointbd out that :fhe;Bni was not a new one, ijaving been before the House last session. It had also been submitted to close inspection 'm 'the Upjier House, where jit ha s s ' been passed. 'He urged the Hoq'se not to ttrtow the i Bill-out* On a purely technical'objection; „; , . i ..The qn.estiqn that! the Bill be read(a* second time ou Thursday was put and a division- called , for. The result was 'ad follow* :— Ay es, 46. Noes, 19. ' j .■-•;(! 7 :-i .- ? J:J ;-. 1 --,■■>' .: • 1.-, .7

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18841020.2.10

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume IV, Issue 277, 20 October 1884, Page 2

Word Count
310

PARLIAMENTARY. Manawatu Standard, Volume IV, Issue 277, 20 October 1884, Page 2

PARLIAMENTARY. Manawatu Standard, Volume IV, Issue 277, 20 October 1884, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert