FEILDING R. M. COURT.

Manawatu Standard, Volume IV, Issue 232, 28 August 1884, Page 2

FEILDING R. M. COURT.

_■ ■ ! -YESTERDA^.v -,^ : -:*££>» /. ;. ■. ! L ; ICENsilifE bp''bENßlOiat-H6tiß%:^^ ~-^hOTiea-Roe,i|sensw of th^jfi*.:', ' b^A .Hotel, was formation 6f Constable Gflla^^^fi a breach of the Licengj^^Asj^ M ; ' vt keeping open his public featf .qi£ $wp day the 24th August*' v\- ■• '^t^T^ ; -Mr J. Herbert- Hankins ap^trMt ' The defence' set tfp;wa«|ithkfr tH* 1 '- 1 bar was opened, for 'pilvate <pifrpteel v <* of <;he licensee and the information :' wasj dismissed. - •/ >; >ic/l. supPLYifo' liquor ! 6y smroiV/ii ! < ! . ' 4^Pp c . *».* « 1 8ocbarged I wi&'to» plying I%^ to.one Ghai'les Hodges on: Sunday the, 24th August. ,MrJ, H. .Hankins appeared) far Ci the accused, ;v (j . ,; - ii f ; It was contended on behalf of Mr Roe that there w*j no evidence. df-~-consumption, nor that the liquor ak , leged to hav«&Keeiiasijppliea.wa» tttp' ; plied and the information was dis» .miflsed; ":■«'■? '■Viitx:-!'}'. y.^:::;' Ui>or SUPPLYi^^y^ A P|ioTO^B^..|;; The .same, i de/endantj was ,j theft r r | charged witli having supplied liquor /to W. S. Sl^te fie b^iag F rpr6hiDit^^ s pertjon. . Mr J. H. Hankins Am appeared fcrMr Roe. f rt^ JSIr Roe admitted* having supplied a « late °f claret, other evidence was adduced for purpose of proving that spintuons.liduora had been supplied,^ The Bench contended |b*t tberJr had been no intentional breach of th#, law as the; accused was evidentlr nni^ der 1 the impression tlmt the claret wag a non-intoxicant. The\ Migia^raW | held that i beyond %he ac^nyi' 8 * Jj3» ;*■ admission, there §ot sjjißcienfceik « derice WcditVret;- defendant wal 3 fin^ ' In answer to Mr Hankins the Bench,, said it would not^ make^artb T "1 order a* to CQsfejnor4)r<lor the convic- '-> tfon to be endoreeid pn!theKcofl». !\- ° : ■Jpn. Hastie was charged-on a similar information for. f?upnlvinff lianor to" W. SrSt«it e WwaSdtS'^ costs of court »>nd.witneflßesi ; exjpent»eß» Mr Prior appeared for acouse^.'* 4 -; Brtvje was cj»^nifc n^j^^ ? The accused swore tfiaiT the liquor., fftipplied was peppermint m vhicOe^ '*"' was corrobomted^y Hr Sfcaite.an<it i the information was dismissed, .Clark employee df str ! C. Buift W* Bhlls, ; brewer was chareeol npon aj*. .^ ; information for supplying W. 8, ' Staite with a cask of beer. ' ' The accused was defended By^Mr ■ Staite and ii was alleged that the/ale was for household^ purpqses.- > . Accused was fined 40s arid costs. ( \ There were a few civ2U «wes- <Jf no public: importance. *' - v