CORRESPONDENCE.
B.M. C'CJtJJiT J USTICE. I
(TO THE EDITOR MAVXWATU STAADaAd) r S^— In your issue of; Saturday^ljast ' you r re-mark ' and . ,y«rv.. j ustly too |on the Judicial EWee inacted at the Resi— '-■■ 'dent Jyiagistrace's _ Coui;t qn :; )the"/; day 'j>reyipu^, but I t|iink it w haaiesoap!eil; your notice that .a. greater farce \jras gone through _on Thursday before R.M.,. himself.- / li^ ihe ca«e of Russell? ! against n^y^lf, being.a^laimforadviei'tisirig, &cV, the' evidence allowed (except by consent of the ]>laintiff) tojbe offered , consisted solely the resr pective allegations of plaintiff and de^ fendanfr, but ,1 relied ichiefiy on collate-' ral evidence to support mine. Judge of my surprise when on stating my in-r tension tocalt Mr 'McMinn ' and Constable Gillespie to .gijve evidence as to the usual _ charges ma.de for adyertisitig impounding notices, : .the Resident Magistrate flatly refused ,to hear stich : evidence except on the conditions. above i aferf ■ Wbfoiptly ' closed" the case. . Wj7» on thfiiface: ofit? i*:is-fptepOstfer-ou§ ; tp sujjposei thnt> 1: -wonkl, after time, insert aclvertisementa on the usual scale,- without making arrangements for a 'considerable reduction, as x it.is a notorious fact that' a'large proportion of the impounded animals when bi ought;.; to sale do iiot realise the expenses actually mc arred on their account The']' '; jilaintif? confidently -ayerred , Jiba j; [^Vhaja njade a yetfr/out of the Pound, to which Ilreply that had such ,Veeß. the case I wonl4»pnly. too gladly Jet this -nioflern .^hylock have had his, ' nouhd'pf. flesli an 4 welcome; j • but, l can //di^prov/5 the assertion^ of tjie plaintifi? by"{he aid of the Borough. ( bpoks r which show, that; halt ; the amotiiiti.is neaier Jihe.inark,.,,. Another of fhe' plaintiffs'^ rash and unfounded statements^ made ony oath too, w»^s that. T had not n^iid. a; jingle penny of the account owing by me to the estate of tl^e late M r Dungi^n,and , that he; found 'trikt'auch wasthejjase on referring to books in.Mr, jerkins' office; The answer to thii. misj-sjsitement is, that I hold a receipt for^^on.accqunt signed by ' G. K. I)ungan, and have also; a account of "about £3, which with the discount' 'always allowed me by the late proprietor of the Manavaiu ; Times, wiiraftouisqnare : off the claim idf. tie Evoijutorß. Ui l: en^ose 2 copy, of ifeoeipt^ the- Original i>i Which is m iriy' ipossessiori. — I^atny'&c'/ ; fi: ; f • ;!! ,";' "' ' ■C - ;! . Thos. GfobDisoN. ': .:;;vi. i- ■ . '-GOPY^OiP RECEiTT. 3 ;' .' ; ',; . . . . ReeeiTed p*y faient of 'Sa part 1 'rnywent m the Estate of ; tjip laJteJiJ?.i<Oangi)n^ ■■■ ; ' (Signed ; ,G.; 4, Doii.<sti^. ! "' ' '" (.Stamp). ','■' " ; ,..,(
I, i ! i M/^umm^iiHidmm^^^mt ■ ■ ' ' •■•'
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18840121.2.24
Bibliographic details
Manawatu Standard, Volume IV, Issue 45, 21 January 1884, Page 3
Word Count
413CORRESPONDENCE. Manawatu Standard, Volume IV, Issue 45, 21 January 1884, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.