THE PROPOSED BOROUGH LOAN.
Mayors Reply to tt>e Times. After' tbo "ordinary business of tjj.e Boroughs JOounicU had concluded, last nijjlre^T&Ss'' llieAlaVor stated thjusejjad matter tQ bring benu'i oe^iCfewtt6il; A= leadetptte had appeared m ,^e ]^a^ftwattt. Times reflecting qn tHe manner m vhich tjje propqse.d. Bprpugiji .Loan had been put before >he ratepayers." Mayqr pi tii9 ®6rotigli he' would' not allow the statement to go .unchallenged, as it wt^ likelj£3ft^ff«jJt the yuteajqf . tat^ayfjrs. fl[p 4id not think j..fc would haviß bpeft djg^i%Ba ( fe^bjin, lQ hayp vWr^tef» ,tp $& papprsl "He bar} recced ,bi» answer to article to writing,; which he expected would appear ia the papers on the following day. ' '..:...■>•'■ ■ ... /
Mr Snelson then read the following : - . In a sub-leader inserted m the Tiuu's of the .7th inst., referring t« «^e l>u» llc meeting which I convened to consider the " loan proposal*, 11 the wditor says the advocates of the scheme challenged the statement that the Council could strike rates up to 2/- m£, and then ho proceeds to shew that the Municipal Corporation Ac), 1876, limits the general rate to 1/- m t-he £, but that separate rates may likewise be made equal to 1/- m Lh& £, or a total of 2/-. The statement challenged at the public meeting was to the effect that tho Council had power to strike a rate of 2/- m the pound for ordinary expenditure. No one can deny tliat the burgesses have the power to rate themselves tor special vrorks, hilt this power does not m any wayliflect the question at issue, namely, " How the ; ordinary expenses of the Borough were to be provided for, ' as rates raised- for special works must be expended on such works, and m po other way. The summing up up of the e&ior that the challengers, ,• were not awire ot^the legislation .under' Boroughs were worked,' or'that We distorted facts to meet the exigencies of the moment, is not certainly ftue. ,1 would also allude to statements made m the leader of the same newspaper on the same day, which would induce one to suppose that the annual revenue of the town is to remain at it* present figures, whereas past experience shows jkhatevery year since our incorporation, an increase^. steady but true, has taken place. We as a Council thereforeJwl justified m believing that by the judicious expenditure; of the proposed loan a much! IKrger increase will arise, providing;!* margin quite ample and sufficient for working expenses.; and m conclusion, I .would remark, during the time the greater portion of the loan -was unexpended, -and before, this said .increase could be expected, "the interest esfc derived from such portions would, added toy/ the; balance; of ordinary* revenue available, fully (supply the • requirements for ordinary expetces. Tbisjit nvusfc be noticed, has been only casually alluded to and carefully ignored m the total arrived at.. ■■■>•'■■ ■■'■■■■■>■■ '■
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18840110.2.31
Bibliographic details
Manawatu Standard, Volume IV, Issue 36, 10 January 1884, Page 3
Word Count
473THE PROPOSED BOROUGH LOAN. Manawatu Standard, Volume IV, Issue 36, 10 January 1884, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.