Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

To the Editor; Sir :—Onlooker, writing in your issue of the 27th June with reference to the cost of breaking stones with the Corporation’s machine says the total amount per yard is 7s 6 2~5d. The estimate of 60 yards fpr the two days is not altogether fair, as 90 odd yards have been carted out as the result of two day’s work, and that, when the, machine was not in operatiomall the time. It will thus be seen that the output was a third more than that on which the calculation wash s d ; consequently there is a very material reduction in the cost per yard. It is all very well for outsiders to step in and fake up a statement which is misleading, possibly intentionally so. Onlooker before rushing iido print, should sit down and ask himself ; whether he could not be better employed in vending Pink Pills, or axe handles. I am, etc., One of the Council.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MOST19020718.2.8.1

Bibliographic details

Motueka Star, Volume II, Issue 97, 18 July 1902, Page 5

Word Count
160

Untitled Motueka Star, Volume II, Issue 97, 18 July 1902, Page 5

Untitled Motueka Star, Volume II, Issue 97, 18 July 1902, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert