Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ST. BATHANS.

•Resident Magistbate's Court.;(Before H. W. Kobiuson, Esq., E..M.) Affray.—Samuel Hanger and Edward Wheeler, appeared to answer an information for making an affray, in a public street at St. Bathans, to the terror of ber Majesty's subjects, &c. It appeared that tho row had arisen in a dispute about a handsaw, and the defendant (Hanger) bad struck the other defendant (a mere lad) with the flat of the saw. The boy beingstrong, and Hanger an elderly man, the result was that both came to the ground. Some amusement was occasioned in Court when the Magistrate asked if anybody had been much frightened. The Court considered the case of quite a trivial nature, and discharged both parties. + Wabden's Cofbt. (Before H. W. Robinson, Esq., Warden.) John Cormick and .Richard Wheeler v. John Griffiths.—The complaint ia this case set forth that, on the ]Bth of Sep? tember, Griffiths had sold to the plaintiffs his' half interest in an extended claim of two acres at Vinegar Hill, for the sum of £23, and that he had refused to complete the transaction by executing a transfer, and the complainants asked that he should be adjudged to execute the transfer, or to pay £5 damages. On opening the case, it. appeared that the sale was not denied, but, as there had been no witness, defendant thought he was able to back out of it. It came out in evidence that the plaintiffs had first bonght the interest of Griffiths's partner, and that Griffiths had immediately afterwards sold them his share at the same price, and given them possession ■—removing the tools. The C<u-t enquired wheo the purchase moniy had been paid, and plaintiffs stated that, they had paid no money to Griffiths but had offered to pay. The Warden observed that they did not appear to have suffered any particular rhimage, as they .had got thti property without any pay-

mp.nt. It would be time enough for them to demand a transfer from Griffiths when he (Mr. Griffiths) thought fit to demand payment. Case dismissed." """' " "" Grants.—Johii.Ewing, tail race ; James Dillon, residence area; Griffith Jones, water.race, from Brown's creek; E. Morgan,_ extended claim; W. Thurlow," protection j ■Scandinavian Company, protection ; J. Morgan, protection.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MIC18761020.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume VII, Issue 397, 20 October 1876, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
368

ST. BATHANS. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume VII, Issue 397, 20 October 1876, Page 3

ST. BATHANS. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume VII, Issue 397, 20 October 1876, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert