MAEREWHENUA.—ApriI 4.
"Warden's Court, (Before H. "W. Robinson, Esq., Warden.) Barclay v. Bcckitt and Bailey.—Mr. Rowlatt for defendants. Tliis was a cornplaint for forfeiture of one half of a two acre claim, held by defendants at Cabbige Tree Point. The Warden visited the ground. The complainant who conducted his own case, called two witnesses to prove that o:e of the defendants had not been seen by them to work in their claim within the period specified in the complaint, but were unable to say that he might not iiave so worked without their knowledge. Mr. Rowlatt submitted that there was no case made out for the complainant, and, the Court agreeing, dismissed the complaint, with 30s. costs of three witnesses, and £3 3s. professional expenses, Grauts. —Howe and Cooper, extended claim; W. Bailey, water race; Howe and another, dam; Bailey and others, extension of water race; F. Botting, dam; J. Botting, extended claim; Mosquito Company (Limited), extension of water race; Farquharson and another, extended claim, tail race and dam; Gilmore and others, extended claim.
Refused.—W. Bailey, residence area. Withdrawn.—Barclay and others, extended claim.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MIC18760407.2.12
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume VII, Issue 370, 7 April 1876, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
183MAEREWHENUA.—April 4. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume VII, Issue 370, 7 April 1876, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in