Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WARDENS COURT.

Monday, March S.

■ (Before H. W. Robinson, Esq , Warden.)

Leys and- another .v. Brookes.—This was a complaint that the defendant, being the occupier of a residence area held under. certificate JN T o. 390'4, between the two races of complainants and Moore and party, had neglected to comply with the Rules and Regulations with regard to the marking of the same ; and, further, thatthe notice of the area being protected for a longer: period of fourteen days had not been posted, in terms of the said Bules. and Regulations, and asking that the defendant's title might be cancelled.: The complaint was admitted by the defendant, and a request made that a monetary fine be inflicted in lieu 6f : forfeiture. * The Warden said that, though there had been undoubted neglect-on the part- of the defendant,he did not consider it of so grave a nature as to vrarrant him "in cancelling defendant's certificate, and so,deprive him, of what might be a:.valuable property.He thought the neglect wunld be sufficiently met by, a small fine. -Pined 10s. and costs,, half the fine to go* to complainants ' ' Mr. Mertslet for -compi ai nan ts; - the | defendant appearing personally. ■ A further application..was. again made, by Mr. Hertslet, v.n behalf'"of Leys and another, to enter upon the residence area lately granted to Air.- W. L.„ Bailey, and at present in tlie occupaf.ipn of Mr. Mir; ehael Brookes. s After hearing evidence," the Warden wais of opinion that gold had been fairly > traced to the boundaries of the' firea in question, and granted permission to enter thereupon iand -prospect.Mr. Bailey 'for objectors.. : * • An application by .a party of Chinamen for the declaration of an area of four acres, situate at Wet Gully, to be declared open to .be-taken up .;as extended^'claims, in terms of section 4, wai—there being~hb" objection—granted. . .

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MIC18750312.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume VI, Issue 315, 12 March 1875, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
303

WARDENS COURT. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume VI, Issue 315, 12 March 1875, Page 2

WARDENS COURT. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume VI, Issue 315, 12 March 1875, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert