RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT
September 29th. (Before H: W. Robinson, Esq., It M.) Law v. Creigliton.— Claim of '£lß la. 3d. Mr. Howlatt, for the ; defendant, objected tliat the particulars of demand furnished were not in accordance with, the provisions of the 31st section of the ]{esident Magistrates' Act, ,1867, and the plaintiff was therefore nonsuited with 16s. costs, and 21s. professional ice. * London v. Mcholas Heed.—Claim of £2 for «qods supplied. The defendant did not deny receiving "the goods, but attempted to plead the Statute of Limitations. As no notice of this plea had been given, judgment went: for the.plaintiff with (JOSt.S.,,. : ", ■_ V ...... • Aitken v. Bryson.—Jijdgment by confession for £9 12s, .
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MIC18731003.2.6
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume IV, Issue 239, 3 October 1873, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
111RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume IV, Issue 239, 3 October 1873, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in