HAMILTON.—Nov. 19.
"Warden's Court. (Before H. W. Robinson Esq., Warden.) Stevens and''others v. Nicholas and others.—Complaint tor forfeiture of tail race near Shepherd's hut. .Mr. Hertslet for plaintiffs. Mr. Bailey for defendants. Mr. Bailey, on behalf of the defendants, said that he was instructed to plead that the tail race in question was not their property; he, therefore/asked that the case be dismissed, and, as his clients had been wrongly brought to Court, he claimed costs. Mr. Hertslet, for the other side, submitted that defendants would not have been brought to Court if they had not represented" themselves as the owners of the property. The Warden took evidence on this matter, and finally decided to dismiss the case, but refused to allow costs. Special Claim.—The application of Mchoias and Company, at Shepherd's hut, was withdrawn. Grants.—J. Roberts, extended claim; A. Roberts, extended claim and tail race; Booth and another, tunnell; A. Esson, tail race; J. Penkefch, extended claim; W. Edmonds, extended claim. Withdrawn.—A Esson, tail race. I
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MIC18721129.2.19
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume III, Issue 196, 29 November 1872, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
167HAMILTON.—Nov. 19. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume III, Issue 196, 29 November 1872, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in