DISTRICT COURT.—JuIy 17.
(Before his Honor Judge Wilson Gray)
M'Aulay and party v. O'Connell and party. —This v* as an appeal irom a decision made by Mr. Warden Robinson at Hyde, on the 27th of May last, when a judgment was given against the present appellants for the sum of £45, for interference with respondents' mining lease area and the loss of gold resulting therefrom. This judgment it was the object of the present appeal to reverse, in consequence, however, of some informality (the Warden not having been served with a notice of appeal, as provided for in the Goldfields Act), his Honor decided that, as the service of such notice was imperative under the Act, it was not competent for him to let the ease proceed, and dismissed the appeal without costs. Mr. Hertslet for appellants, Mr. Bailey for respondents.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MIC18720719.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume III, Issue 176, 19 July 1872, Page 511
Word count
Tapeke kupu
141DISTRICT COURT.—July 17. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume III, Issue 176, 19 July 1872, Page 511
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in