Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WARDEN'S COURT.—Bth Aril.

(Before tf. W. tiobinson, Esq., Warden.) Christian Archer v. Douglass and others.— This was a claim for the sum of £llO, being the amount for which it was alleged the plaintiff had sold a eertain interest in a certain water race at Kyeburn. For the defence it was alleged that Christian Archer; not being in possession of a miner's right at the time of the alleged sale, was entirely out of Court; that the name of Christian Archer not being on any of the certificates he was- not in a position to sue; that the property belonged to plaintiff's brother David, in whose name it stood, and who alone was entitled, if anyone, to recover. These points, which were for a nonsuit, being overruled by the Bench, it was then sought to be shown for the defence that there had been no sale or bargain of any kind. After a lengthy hearing of evidence of the most conflicting and contradictory character, the complaint was dismissed with costs of Court 365., and expenses of defendant's witnesses. It. Rons v. A.Brown.—This-was a complaint for interference with complainant's* water right iu .Enterprise Q- illy, in contravention of sec. 1, Regulation 26, G-oldfields Rules and Regulations. Complaint withdrawn. Thursday, Apbil 11.

. Mr. Smythies asked for a re-hearing in the case of Archer v. Douglass, which was heard on the Bth inst. His Worship said that he could entertain no application of this nature unt 1 a written notice of the intention to make such application had been lodged in the Court, and a copy thereof served upon the defendants. He would name Monday the 15th as the day upon which he would hear arguments in support of the application for a rehearing of the case. In the meantime Mr. Smythies would give necessary, notice to defendants.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MIC18720412.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume III, Issue 162, 12 April 1872, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
305

WARDEN'S COURT.—8th Aril. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume III, Issue 162, 12 April 1872, Page 5

WARDEN'S COURT.—8th Aril. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume III, Issue 162, 12 April 1872, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert