Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WIDOW ACQUITTED.

DEATH OP HUSBAND. DAUGHTERS AWFUL ORDEAL. After ten minutes’ retirement the jury at Ayr High Court recently acquitted Mrs. Eileen Ludgate, a slim, attractive woman, accused of causing the death of her husband, Major William Ludgate, D. 5.0., a retired officer of the Indian Army Veterinary Service. Major Ludgate was shot' at his home, at Ayre on May 6, and died on the following day. Thousands of people sought admission to the court for the hearing, but fewer than 200 were accommodated.

A dramatic ,story was related by a daughter of accused, Rosamund Ludgate, aged 19, a typist. She said she was born in India during the time that her father was on duty there. He also served in Ireland, in Prance during the war, at Aldershot and again in India. While in the East he drank heavily, and frequently abused her mother. On his discharge from the Army the family removed to Ayr, and there her father gave way so heavily to drink that her mother left him on several occasions, returning finally on his promise to reform. Both her father and mother kept loaded revolvers. In May last her father was again drinking to excess. WHAT LED TO THE TRAGEDY. Relating the incident that led up to the tragedy witness broke down and wept bitterly. Her father, she said; staggered,' home early that day, and in the evening he was threatening. So alarmed did her mother become that she sent a son to his grandmother to bring the loaded magazine of her pistol, which witness hid in her suitcase in a bedroom. In the evening, said witness, her father followed her to a sitting room and made an improper suggestion. She wrenched herself clear and rushed into the kitchen. Her father followed, and struck her across the face. She defended herself with a walking-stick, and her mother tried to drive off: her father with a heavy brush. He then made for his bedroom, where he kept his revolver, and as lie said he would kill them, witness and her mother rushed upstairs to a box-room. The father followed, and entered the bedroom of a younger daughter, who, awakening out of her sleep, screamed. Her mother, alarmed for their safety,'fired her revolver at the wall. It clicked and she exclaimed, “My God! It won’t work.” Later her mother fired another shot and her father fell. Witness saw he could not move, and she dashed outside. “I WILL KILL YOU NOW.” Cross-examined by Mr. Craigie Aitcliison, who conducted the defence, witness said her father went on like a and standing in front of a mirror made terrible grimaces. He also used coarse and obscene language. When her father came upstairs he shouted, “My God, I will 1 kill you now!” A neighbour gave evidence that just after shooting, Mrs. Ludgate was on the verge o| collapse, crying, “My God, I have shot my husband! I had to do it. My daughter was in danger.” Medical evidence showed that deceased had one gunshot wound, and that he died under chloroform while undergoing an operation. Mrs. Ludgate, in her evidence, corroborated her daughter’s account of the tragedy. Her husband, she said, was undoubtedly insane, and a deed of separation had been prepared, but she relied on his promise to reform. She overheard the suggestion her husband made to their daughter, and later he declared, “I will kill you in five minutes.” In view of _all the circumstances she did not regard her conduct as reckless. Counsel for the Crown, addressing the jury, said the question was whether the prisoner was legally justified in firing at her husband. He asked for a verdict of culpable homicide.

A VERDICT OP “NOT GUILTY.” Mr. Aitcliison said the evidence overwhelmingly established a situation of emergency entitling prisoner to act as she did. He did not appeal on any unwritten law, but on the law of Scotland, which laid it down that a person reasonably apprehensive if her life was entitled to act in her defence or use violence to protect herself oi her children. The jury aften ten minutes’ deliberation returned a unanimous verdict of not guilty. Mrs. Ludgate, on being discharged, was surrounded by her relatives and oveiwhelmed with congratulations.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19270922.2.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVIII, Issue 3694, 22 September 1927, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
707

WIDOW ACQUITTED. Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVIII, Issue 3694, 22 September 1927, Page 1

WIDOW ACQUITTED. Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVIII, Issue 3694, 22 September 1927, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert