Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DECAY OF MANNERS

WHOSE IS THE FAULT?

ARE MEN OR WOMEN TO BLAME?

Some amusing views were exchanged at the school of Economics, in London, on a recent evening, when Lady Rhondda and Mr. St. John Ervine, the well-known dramatic critic and playwright, with Miss Edith Evans, London’s leadino- emotional actress, as their not too impartial chairman, argued the point, “Are Women Fit Companions for Men?” Mr. Ervine, who boldly assumed the role of challenger, declared (according to a report in the London “Daily djelegraph”) that ever since women had been enfranchised men’s manners had gone to pieces. Until women began to smoke no man ever dreamed of smoking in a theatre. (Laughter). Another disgusting habit entirely due to women was the cocktail habit. In his view cocktails were only for women and Americans. (Laughter). The great days of the English theatre were those when women were allowed neither in the auditorium nor on the stage. The moment women were admitted indecency became rampant. The Restoration drama coincided with the advent of women on the stage, and when thev were first seen there they were hissed by the indignant and virtuous men. (Laughter). When women went into the audience tragedy was abolished from the stage. The simple reaspn was that women wanted to see something at which they could giggle. When Shakespeare was produced at the Old Vic. and elsewhere the men predominated in the queues, but when a lecherous play was given anywhere it was the women who thronged there. (Laughter). What men were entitled to demand of women was comradeship. They must no longer trade on their sex, which was what they always did, but what men never did —(laughter) —and they must be prepared to take their stand with men o'n terms of friendship and equality. It was a foul libel that women were finer and more beautiful creatures than men. Let them go to the Zoo, and there they would see that the male was always the more beautiful animal of the species. (Laughter). Women had to realise that in beauty of mind, body, and character men were their superiors. (Laughter). Man was a creature full of romance and with a burning desire for adventure. He aspired to contend with danger and death and it was the woman who lured him into the cities, which he hated, because she herself loved life and gaiety. What she said was, “Come and be comfortable.” (Laughter). It was because women liked crowds and doing the same things as other women did in such a convention-ridden way that the world was getting into such a pitiful plight. (Laughter). Lady Rhondda, far'from taking a defensive standpoint, retorted with the question, “Are Men Fit Companions for Women?” (Laughter). Like all men, Mr. Ervine blamed women for everything. Perhaps his most amazing suggestion was that the decadence of the drama was due to them. In theatrical matters the tastes, of nine men out of ten was simply deplorable. (Laughter). Wlhenever women tried to get theatre parties together they always said: —“We shall have to go to ajnusical comedy; the men will •be bored if we go to anything else.” (Laughter). As to the statement that the abolition of tragedy was ,due to women, she had often thought that perhaps the reason why . there was such an enormous number of murders and suicides in Shakespeare was because he had to appeal to the bloodthirsty tastes of his masculine audiences. (Laughter). She admitted that men did succeed “fairly well” in their endeavours to be fit companions, but their one noticeable and serious drawback, especially in Englishmen, was that they could not talk or listen to a woman’s “shop.” On the other hand one of the salient qualities of women was their ability to take an intelligent and sympathetic interest in .men’s “shop.” Miss Edith Evans, in closing the debate, touched on the suggestion that women predominated in the queues at unpleasant plays. At the end of one of Mr. Bernard Shaw’s works there was the sentence, “God gave one great gift to women curiosity.” (Laughter). So they went with open, expectant eyes to hear of these things of the great world which were unknown to men, but well known to women. (Laughter) .

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19270809.2.22

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVIII, Issue 3675, 9 August 1927, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
707

DECAY OF MANNERS Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVIII, Issue 3675, 9 August 1927, Page 4

DECAY OF MANNERS Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVIII, Issue 3675, 9 August 1927, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert