Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE FUSION QUESTION.

A tlnoil of light was cast on the fusion in gutialions between the Reform and Libera!•Labour Parties on Tuesday (says the Dominion). Revelations weie anticipated, and il wa- to•!cd when the House of Re-pre.-eiilativi-s met that hoili the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Oppiedlinn had before them bulky piles of correspondence. Nearly an hour was -pent, however, in the transaction of routine business, and in a first-reading debate on a Bill introduced by a Labour member before the Prime Minister rnsr to make his anticipated stuleincut. In this he reviewed the in-ler-parly discussions, and read the whole of the correspondence which has passed between Mr Wilford and himself on the subject of fusion. Interest emit fed, of cnui'sc, mi the letters exchanged by the parly leaders during the past two weeks. Mr ('nates made il quite clear that although negotiations had been broken off by the Liberal-Labour Parly. he was himself ready to discuss the fusion question in further detail, and intended in any case to seek a mandate from the electors its leader.'of a National Parly. Alt' Milford afterwards reviewed and criticised the Prime Minister'statement.

Fur the first time this session, the House uf Representatives spent an aflcriiomi yesterday in debating Ilie replies of Ministers to questions. When the Address-ill-Reply deli,•)te was resumed in the evening, Mr Savage, mi behalf of the Labour Parly, at once moved another noconfidence amendment —the fourth id I In 1 debate and fifth of the session. After a debate which, stive for a brief speech by Sir James Parr, was carried on chiefly by Labour members, the amendment was defeated on a division by 38 Vules to 33.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19250716.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVII, Issue 2910, 16 July 1925, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
280

THE FUSION QUESTION. Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVII, Issue 2910, 16 July 1925, Page 2

THE FUSION QUESTION. Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVII, Issue 2910, 16 July 1925, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert