Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

BILL BEFORE PARLIAMENT

WELLINGTON, Oct. 13.

In committee on the Workers C ompensation Bill in the House to-nijrhr on clause four Mr Parry moved an amendment that a deceased worker’s dependants should receive compensation equal to the amount, of the average weekly earnings for hvo vears. . . . ' Mr Wilford said the basis ot compensation should be a weekly allowance tor widows and dependants, and not lump sum payments. The Minister said the proposal would mean the addition of -20 per cent, to the premiums. The Government could not ask for this from the employers in the present condition of business and industry. I lie Bill as it stood made the best provision ot any compensation system in.-the world. On division the amendment was (ideated by 35 to 24. , 'in clause five Mr Wilford moved to delete from sub-clause 10 the words “but not exceeding £l.” which would mean that an injured person would in addition to the compensation payable be entitled to reasonable expenses incurred in respect ol medical or surgical attendance'. The Minister said he was unable to accept the amendment because in 1920 the perrtmtnge was increased front 50 to 55. tlie intention being at that time that the additional five per cent, was to assist an injured person to meet his medical expenses. In this Bill the. percentage was again being increased to 58. which still further assisted an injured person. The amendment left, the amount for medical services too open. It might amount to £2O and that would become a serious mattor. The amendment, was defeated on the voices, and the remaining clauses were passed as amended by the Labour Bills Committee. , In the second schedule Mr Barry moved an amendment to include compensation for the total loss of a big toe. lie said that timber workers were specially liable to thus class of accident. The Minister said he recognised the merits of the case and if it could he done without undue expense lie would have the amendment inserted in the I .cgi-lat ive ( ouncil. On this understanding Mr Barry agiceil to withdraw his amendment. The Bill wa; then reported, read the third time, and passed.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19221017.2.36

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XLIV, Issue 2494, 17 October 1922, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
362

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION Manawatu Herald, Volume XLIV, Issue 2494, 17 October 1922, Page 4

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION Manawatu Herald, Volume XLIV, Issue 2494, 17 October 1922, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert