SUPREME COURT.
BUSINESS FOR NEXT SESSION,
The following cases have been set down for hearing at the Palmerston North Supreme Court sessions, commencing on Tuesday, February 15th:— CRIMINAL. William Joseph O’Dwyer, alleged false pretences; Thomas Martin, alleged embracery. Valentine Joseph Owen, alleged theft; William Henry Grant, alleged theft from a dwellinghou.se; William Snow, alleged indecent assault; Alexander A. J. Burling, alleged false pretences. CIVIL. (Before Judge and Jury of Twelve.) Donald Mackenzie v. Edward and Martha Collins, claim for £528 15s Cd rent and £BG2 10s damages for alleged breach of covenant ; Samuel John Atkins v. A. D. Kennedy and Co., Ltd., claim for £3OO deposit and £250 as damages; William E. Power v. Samuel J. Atkins, claim for return of deposit of £3OO, £ll3 Is as expenses, and £IOO as damages; counter claim for £346 4s as eoni/ussion and £IOO as damages. (Before the Judge alone.)
Richard Joseph Harper v. Charlotte C. Whittaker and Winnie Etheridge, claim for declaration, etc.; W. 11. Ellis v. B. E. Smith,'claim for order for accounts; V. L. Poingdestre v. Cornelius James Danahev and Phillip Reginald Webber, application for dissolution of partnership; Harry Woolven v, Bertram J. Frecklington, claim for specific lycrfonnance; J. Bet-t and Bailey, Ltd., v Jackson and Biles, claim for £364 6s 4d for goods said lo have been supplied; Thomas Bevan v. Robert Bevan, application for decree for administration. IN DIVORCE.
Amy Louisa Nott v. Thomas J. Noll, application for dissolution of marriage; Henrietta Coombe v. James Henry Coombe, application for dissolution of marriage; Albert J. Burns v. Ruby E. Burns, application for dissolution of marriage; Robert Flutcy v. Ellen P. -Fluiev, application for dissolution <»J. marriage. IN BANCO. a Official Assignee in the estate of Reeves and William- v. J. D. Piper,
appeal from Magistrate’s decision; Jessie Margaret Munson v. Andrew R. McLeod, motion for writ of attachment; Emily Mary Crewe v. J. D. C. Crewe and G. 11. Smith, motion to set aside judgment.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19210210.2.22
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, Volume XLIII, Issue 2237, 10 February 1921, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
326SUPREME COURT. Manawatu Herald, Volume XLIII, Issue 2237, 10 February 1921, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Manawatu Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in