SHOULD WIFE-BEATERS BE FLOGGED?

Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXIV, Issue 1013, 22 October 1912, Page 4

SHOULD WIFE-BEATERS BE FLOGGED?

At the Auckland Magistrate’s Court recently, a separation order was sought by Mrs Johanna Patterson against her husband, Jas. Patterson, on the ground that he bad been guilty of persistent cruelty. The story of her married

life, as unfolded by Mrs Patterson, was of a pitiful nature. She had been married for seven years, her husband being a labourer. Four children had been born. The primary cause of the trouble, she said, was the fact of her husband being prone to stay away from home and indulge in drinking bouts. On another occasion she had reproved him for drinking in the house, and he retaliated by putting her outside. On another occasion he had struck her several times. It was stated by the husband that he had never been given to drinking until about 13 months after their marriage. He had taken to drink in desperation, owing to constant “nagging” to which he was subjected by his wife. Regarding the allegation ot assault upon his wife, he affirmed that he had not struck her, but had merely pushed her. Mr Kettle, S.M., described the case as being a “dreadful business.” “I believe her statements regarding your behaviour to be true,” said Mr Kettle to the defendant, “and I am of opinion that you have treated her in a brutal manner. I have always contended that magistrates should have the power to order such men as you to be flogged. It is really the only way to make them feel.” Mr Kettle advised the husband to abstain from drink, and then perhaps his wife, reluctant though she now was, might go back to him. He would suggest an adjournment accordingly. The husband, however, expressed his desire to have the separation order made. This was done, the defendant being ordered to pay 30s a week, and his wife being given custody of the four children.