Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRESPONDENCE

(To the .Editor.)

Sir, —I noticed in your report of Mr Moucktou’s address at Foxion last Monday night, that In answer to a question by Mr Whibley, Mr Mouckton denied having stated at Whitaunui that he had never read the Defence Act, His denial is incorrect. I was one of his audience of twelve, and Mr Mouckton distinctly stated that he had never read the Defence Act, aud that he did not know much about it. Of course, Mr Mouck-'. ton did not make this statement

until he was unable to answer a question in reference to compulsory training. At the same time he supported military training, although he was ignorant of the Act. I might also mention that Mr Mouckton opened his address by saying that the licensing and racing laws of this country were being forced upon the people of this Dominion by a lot of “ wowsers,” aud that he was ‘‘full up” of this "wowserism.’’ When 1 asked Mr Mouckton what he meant by a “ wowser,” he said a “ wowser ” was a man who taught Sunday School one day aud something else the next —in other words, a “wowser " was a hypocrite. Perhaps Mr Mouckton thought it he used such common and gutter remarks he might please the flaxmill employees. If such is the case, I am afraid Mr Mouckton will be amongst the ‘‘ also started ” on December Bth. The workers of New Zealand are fully aware that their representative in Parliament must be a man prepared to lift humanity, and the one way to do so is by removing all enemies to Christianity. Therefore, so long as Mr any other man who claims to fcA long to a reform party, is prepared to side-step these great reform questions, then so long will the people of this Dominion remain in poverty, crime aud disgrace. The very fact that the drink tiaffic was responsible lor producing over 7,000 first convictions lor drunkenness in New Zealand last year is sufficient evidence that it should be wiped out of existence for ever, and it the men whom we return to Parliament are not prepared to bring this into effect they are not doing their duty to the coming generation, aud cannot claim to be called reformers, but on the contrary are a drag to civilisation, 1 should like to tell Mr Mouckton that Prohibition is not a question outside politics, as he thinks, but it is right inside politics, aud it is also one of the great reform questions which every parliament in the world will have to deal with very shortly.—l am, etc., A. H. Yates. Whitaunui.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19111202.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 1077, 2 December 1911, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
439

CORRESPONDENCE Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 1077, 2 December 1911, Page 2

CORRESPONDENCE Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 1077, 2 December 1911, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert