Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NEWS AND NOTES.

A remarkable case of carelessness on the part of a contractor came before the Bruce County Council at its last meeting (says the Otago Daily Times). A letter was received from the contractor, who stated that when he sent in his tender for one of the Council’s contracts he was guided solely by an advertisement he had seen in the Bruce Herald. This contained no reference to twelve chains of cutting and filling that were in the contract, but of which he had known nothing until six months after he had signed it. He considered that, in the circumstances, “between man and man, the Council had a right to pay him extra for these twelve chains.” The Council, however, took a quite different and somewhat unsympathetic view of the situation. “ If he has any claim,” suggested the chairman, “ he might refer to the Bruce Herald, probably.” The letter was merely received.

A Yorkshireman who was converted by the Mormons and became a priest of the sect has returned from Salt Lake City, disillusioned, to Pudsey. This man went to Utah with his wife and daughter. Speaking the other day of his experiences on the way out, he said : Aboard the boat were some hundreds of Mormons, bound for Utah State, Seventeen of them were elders, and all the rest, with the exception of about ten or a dozen, were women and girls from all parts of Europe. Conduct worse than unseemly took place between the married elders and girls at night, and all the precepts about virtuous living and self-ab-negation, so stringently taught in England, were cast to the winds of the Atlantic.” As to the practice of polygamy in Utah, this expriest says : “ A man is, of course, allowed to have only one State recognised wife ; the others are celestial wives— ‘ wives for time and eternity.’ The only difference is that the ceremony is entirely an ecclesiastical one, supposedly binding in the eyes ot the parties concerned, but not in the eyes of the civil authorities. Some of these ‘celestial wives’ have families nevertheless. I have met numerous polygamists who are quite open about it. It is only over here in England where anyone thinks of denying it.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19110420.2.20

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 981, 20 April 1911, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
372

NEWS AND NOTES. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 981, 20 April 1911, Page 4

NEWS AND NOTES. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 981, 20 April 1911, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert