Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A BIG QUESTION.

Wellington, August 27. There is much speculation in and out of the House of Representatives about the proposals of a deputation whioh interviewed the Minister of Justice. The deputation asked that certain clauses of the Public Health Act should have some force to check the spread of venereal disease. Dr. Findlay has submitted outlines of the proposed amendments of the Act to the various members of the deputation. The Minister has not indicated the specific nature of the requests made to him, but a perusal oi the Act plainly reveals the direction in which reform is sought. For example, section 13 states that, for the purpose of preventing or checking the spread of infectious disease, the Governor may, from time to time as he thinks fit make regulations (a) tor house to house visitation, and inspection of the houses, the occupants thereof, and the things therein, and also of the outbuildings, yards, drains ; tb) for the isolating or disinfecting of persons, houses, buildings, places, and things. Under section 18, a District Health Officer, if authorised by the Governor, “ may require persons to report themselves, or submit themselves for medical examination at specified times and places.” Section 25 provides for the sending of notices of|infectious diseases to the District Health Officers. Some members are of opinion that the object of the clergy and other people represented in the deputation is to secure a satisfactory amendment of the Public Health Act to take the place of the Contagious Diseases Act. A Bill for the repeal of the C. D. Act has passed its second reading, but opposition has been threatened for the Committee stage amendment, as the Public Health Act is regarded as a reasonable compromise between the supporters and the opponents of the C.D. Act.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19100830.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXII, Issue 885, 30 August 1910, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
297

A BIG QUESTION. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXII, Issue 885, 30 August 1910, Page 2

A BIG QUESTION. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXII, Issue 885, 30 August 1910, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert