THE RANGIHAETA CASE.
JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF. At Palmerston Supreme Court on Tuesday, Mr Wilford asked that possession of the horse in the the above case be not given plaintiff because it was, he claimed, owned by Mrs Robinson. His Honor pointed out that Mrs Robinson had nothing to do with these proceedings. If she had any rights she should bring independent proceedings,'but his Honor suggested to Mr Wilford that it was probable that she could have no better title to the horse than Robinson could give her, and the jury had found that Robinson had no title to the horse. It was for Mr Wilford to decide whether it was worth while for Mrs Robinson to take any proceedings. Judgment Was entered for plaintiff for the possession of the horse* or its value and ,£IOO damages. The costs granted were as on an action for £SOO. Subsequently Mr Wilford,, on behalf ot Mr Robinson gave notice to the Receiver (Mr Manning) that the horse would be claimed by Mrs Robinson.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19090603.2.17
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXI, Issue 460, 3 June 1909, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
170THE RANGIHAETA CASE. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXI, Issue 460, 3 June 1909, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Manawatu Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in