Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Discussed in the House.

Wellington, October 4. a The Chairman of the Lands Com- r mittee (the Hon. T. Y. Duncan) brought f up the report of the Committee 011 the Land Bill in the Lower House yesterday afternoon, lie said the Committee had considered the Bill and taken evidence, i and had come to the conclusion that it 1 be allowed to proceed, with the amend- t merits made by them. He moved that the report lie on the tabic and be printed. . Mr Massey would, in view of the im- I portance of the measure and the \ general interest taken in its provisions, ] like to see an early date fixed for the j second reading. He urged that the usual half hour limit would be found quite inadequa’c for the proper dis- c mission of the measure in the second f reading debate. v The Hon. the Premier, with regard r to the first point, fixed 7.30 on Tuesday r evening next for the second reading. , With regard to the suggestion to have the time limit standing order sus- 2 pended for the debate, he thought it 0 would be necessary to have some assur- \ ance from the hon. gentleman that the e concession would not be used by any of j. his party for the purpose of obstruction. Mr Massey intimated that to be im- 1 possible as well as unlikely. r The hon. the Premier said there 1 were a great many rumours ot inten- c tion to stonewall and preparations all lor the purpose of destroying the Bill. . Mr Massey said he had no knowledge whatever of any preparations for ' obstruction. He could say there \ would not be anything but fair discus- g sion from his side of the House. He jrepeated that the half hour would be j quite insufficient. How could he reply to the Minister of lands who \ would have an hour ? It would be l unfair to confine him to the lesser limit. _ c The Premier pointed out that the extension of the speaking time for the second reading debate would proportionately delay the committee J work and so take too much of the 1 time at their disposal, which was none t too long as it was for the work. He c would, however, be glad to help , suspend the standing order so as to give the leader of the Opposition an hour for his speech. (Applause.) The motion was agreed to. 1

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19061006.2.20

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XXVIII, Issue 3718, 6 October 1906, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
413

Discussed in the House. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXVIII, Issue 3718, 6 October 1906, Page 3

Discussed in the House. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXVIII, Issue 3718, 6 October 1906, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert