Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DECISIONS OF THIS COURTS.

, Iran .action ,f or dlvqrqe in.Zentuelty thi je/ipt of aripenri ,o| that state J|i the ease 'Of 'Xaiiiliertwa. Lambert, (if S. W. Rep., Cl 4), holds that neither the husband nor the wife is a competent ; witness against! tHeJotb’ejv,!''lTa ,1 A/1 Where a strip of land is conveyed as an “alley,” the supreme court of Illi- ' pom 'tfcaf* fr alley is ' inetmi, rind'the'court* also held that a private alley cannot become public except by condemnation, by grant, 01 by dedication." An office of a hotel is a public place i'#"flhfn"a icitjr/fardibiriiie 'jimkiriidg; !foi.!' . , ; .eif u. ■ of. -any ( ing ... ■;> rangling ,in a public place, an ‘ liifrOiAg 1 ! ti) 'the Vbhft olKdiv r sas, in the case of City of Howard vs Stroud" (G 5 Pac. Rep., 247). In Korth Carolina, p. note indorsee * kbfr ihansfe-rbed (it/* without her husband’s knowledge 01 -cortnent; ■■dticx'Trot' vest-the trttc-'in-thw-indorsee, according to the supreme cou rt of that state in the case of Vann I Oile |vh(| makes an umsl his4and-iJ'iiot bound to sD.gWa.rllJtlu s !.. to prevent injury to children who come upon it without his invitation ■ilri , ptiecfv%Atl 'J duoed to do so merely by the alluring / attractiveness of the excavation and iti(iiimsuridingaJ t. A person who uses a nontransferable mileage ticket and who signs the narae,.of-ih-tnawxLer of the ticket, is not guilty of forgery, holds the supreme court, of tyjssouri in the case of Mer- ■ rlc^s'^vsi' WabAsfli' I^aflvtaytcb^ifaiijn (G,*) S. W. Rep., 718), provided he was , authorized by the owner to sign his | t «pe. w/itJ In a prosecution for murder, where it is claimed that the death of the deby a How on the head, zl cr.’m!".:.? appeals ol T«X!.., Ji; =;. vs. Slate \ (63 f/. 1 1 '■ ■» holdff ttyht a photo* igrapli>... ».■•,' ilm cpn.r!it}on of yijpj brain of .he deceased, after remova. of the skull, is admissible in evidence.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19050706.2.21

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XXVII, Issue 3543, 6 July 1905, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
310

DECISIONS OF THIS COURTS. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXVII, Issue 3543, 6 July 1905, Page 4

DECISIONS OF THIS COURTS. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXVII, Issue 3543, 6 July 1905, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert