Police Court.
Friday, 25th March.
(Before Messrs T. Bennett and A. Fraser, J’s.P.) CRIMINAL. Michael Higgins, on remand, was charged with having received a dog, the property of Charles Lennex, knowlog the same to have been stolen. EviilmifP was given by Charles Wolfersatan that the dog had followed accused. Accused had net made any attempt lo keep the dog nor to send it back. Constable Forster produced a letter from Mr Harper, solicits, Otaki.to Lennex demanding return of the dog to Higgins. , . , , Mr Moore, for accused, contended there was nothing to show accused had received the dog, or knew it was stolen, and that in any case he had not made any attempt to keep it m his custody. The Bench, after consideration decided that as the evidence wa* contradictory and accused had already been in custody, the case would bs dismissed.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19040329.2.21
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, 29 March 1904, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
142Police Court. Manawatu Herald, 29 March 1904, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in