S.M. Court.
(Before A. Greenfield, Esq., S.M.) THIS DAY. / CRIMINAL. Police v. W. Hamer. Charged with an unprovoked assault by striking one Sutcliffe with a stick. Defendant pleaded guilty under provocation. Case dismissed. ■; Police v. Taylor. Charged with assault. Defendant was fined 10s or 48 hours* imprisonment. Police v. Nelson. Charged with procuring liquor for a prohibited person. Pined 20s, costs 7s, or 7 days’ imprisonment. Police v. Thomas Mitchell. Defendant was charged and convicted of procuring liquor for a prohibited person and was fined 40s, costs 7s, or 14 days’ imprisonment. CIVIL OASES. Smale and Hay v. Thompson.Claim 9s. Judgment by [default with costs ss. Smale & Hay* y. T. Lee —Claim £4 4s 2d. Judgment by default with costs ss. Smale & Hay v. A. Garhes. — Claim £1 8s 4d. Judgment by default, ordered to pay 10s a month, costs 6s. Smale & Hay v. A. G. Robinson. Claim £2 5s 9d. Judgment by default with costs ss. . JUDGMENT SUMMONS. Miller v. Matinga Mowati.—Claim £7 12s. An order was made by consent for £1 a month.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19020118.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, 18 January 1902, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
175S.M. Court. Manawatu Herald, 18 January 1902, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in