Magisterial Comments.
« The extract under the above heading in Commissioner TuDbridge'p Report i* a very able answer to thp unc^nsidered remarks of certain magistrates and is well worth perusal : — Recently there have been several Maghtprial comment* on the method* adopted by police in obtaining evidence against persons engaged in 'he "ly-grog traffic, and illegal (or what is popularly known as " tote ") betting. In glaring cases of branches of the law and where it wai impossible fo obtain evidence by other moans, the police have endeavour -ft to procure j)or?ons to pither purchase liquor from tho former or mata b?t^ with tha lafcfcer, and in aomeinstnnce' havfl been successful. Theao m^thod-^a very email min~rUy of f he Magistrates hive coniid^rdd i» their duty to describe as " dangerous ind imdersirahlp," I admit that if evidpnc-? could h* otherwise obtained tha course, d^crib^d should no!; he reported to, but I am unable to discover of.h<?r ra""?n 3 , and if 'he learned gentlem°n in qn^sMon know of othpr m n anq of oh'ainin? thn nece3?ary evidence I fihnnM ba extremp'y sfi-a^eful if they wonld commaoicnt thorn to rap. The matter Pimp'y roanlves it^p.lf into thi* : that thp p->lifiQ are to s^and by and allow wh il a< »alpf» hrpafihp>» of th^ law to gn nnch^ckod, aUhongh in th« ca'p of illpgal ptrept.h-»tting the nui^mf has hocorm littlfl short nf a oryin? r oindai, or p'nenre "vid fl na^ in »h° mmrner dft^oribpd. Si long^ a=i nnn n hnt notorious off-nd-^ra arp by thPß=" ra^nns broughfc to jmtici I prefar to nontinno on the latter ciurs«\ and I feel confid nfc that, notwith^tandinc th^o occasional remarks from thp Masi-storial B?noh, tho police wilV reo^ivp th« support of th« unpre--I'idiced p">r-ion of fh<? commnnity. Tf thprp* wavn suspicion even that an aitpmo l ". had b->pn m^de to pnbrap an innocent or isnorant person into breaking the law, th n there would he com? point in these remarks, bu' I dr>fy anyone to prove that snoh has bepn the ci'p. and in the ahvnae of suf-h proof Kfl lbnrt th°sp Magisterial onmra^nts are uncalled for, and can o^y tend to deter the police from ondpavo'mng to* enforce a prope»* nbs->rvanc9 of fh^ law and. thereby ohpek what U admitted to be ffrowin? evil. I miy add that daring my upwiird-i of tw^ntv- c »K years' experience before the London Metropo litan Police courts Magistrate* | preMdincr afe Mmso Cmrks (amonsr't whom wore the late Sir Thomas Henry, th° W« S ; r James logham, fhn la^o Mi' Montagu William'. Sir J>hn Bridge and Sir Jampp y+nghan) always aco<',ptpd without comment evid^nca against notorious offmder^ obtained in the manner herein described, heing careful, how-p-ver, to spo thit the praoMoa was not abnsfd by an attempt to eatnp an innocent person. If the Magistrates hflre wnve to reserve thsir coramenfs nnMl there was a suggestion that th» practice wag baing abused then I should h^va no oa»re^ to complain, but the pflkcfc of the pr^n 1 : what I consider to be uncalled for remarks h to encourage the lawbreaker and discourasr a thf? policemen.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH18990718.2.13
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, 18 July 1899, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
513Magisterial Comments. Manawatu Herald, 18 July 1899, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.