Wilkie v. Wilkie.
«, AM INTERESTING CASE.
Mr Justice Edwards hag given his decision in a case which lately came i^before him in the form of a motion leave to serve a writ upon the defendants, who were residing out of thi colony, or else serve it upon the resident attorney of one of them. The aotion is that of David Wilkie, contractor, of Waitotara, against John and Adam Wilkie, contractors, of Perftb, Wwt AMtnOift. The itaU-
; ment of claim alleges that in January f 1895, the plaintiff and defendants ' entered into a parole agreement tc become co-partners in certain rail way contracts in Weatern Australia if their tender for the construction oi certain works should be accepted The tender was accepted and the , construction of works begun, and th« [ profits, said to have been large, ware . from time to time divided between i the parties. In January, 1896, die- , putss arose, and in February the defendants refused to acknowledge i the plaintiff as a partner, and prevented him from so acting, hence the action. The railway work ia now being completed. His Honor dismissed the motion, holding that no part of the alleged cause of action arose in this colony.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH18980210.2.22
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, 10 February 1898, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
200Wilkie v. Wilkie. Manawatu Herald, 10 February 1898, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.