Resident Magistrate's Court, Foxton.
(Before H. W. Brabant Esq, R.YI.) THIS DAY. CIVIL CASES. Edmund Osborne v. C. Spriug— Claim, £2 Is. Mr Ray for plaintiff. The defendant had paid amount of olaim aiuoe judg ment Issued, but Mr R&y applied for oosti iaourrsd, Hi. Judgment for plaintiff with i ooiti. ' '
C. Honore v. Heta Ngatuhi— Claim flB 10s Id. Mr Ray for plaintiff. Mr Baker for defendant asked for time for payment. Judgment for amount claimed, and costi 21a. Baker & Co v. Rori Bangiheua— Claim £7 3s. Mr Ray for plaintiff applied for adjournment. Case adjourned to next Court day. George Lyon v. Edward .Tonei and George lingers Claim £6 15s 6d. Mr Ray for plaintiff. No appearance of defendant*. Judgment for amount with costs 21s, solicitor's fee 21s. Paker &. ov. John Burr— Claim £6 17a. Mr Ray for plaintiffs. Adjourned to stli j November. B. Spelman v. F. Howe,— Claim £1 sg4d Mr Ray for plaintiff. 'I he defendant aiked for time. Judgment for plaintiff for tho sum of 12/4 and costs 7/-. The defendant having paid 13s on a/c. B. Sp«lman v. Edward Malcolm,— Claim, £3 11s. Mr Ray for plaintiff. No appearance of defendant. Judgment for amount with costs 7a. C. Honore vM. Collis— Clain £1 19 a 2d. Mr Ray for plaintiff. No appearance •{ defendant. Judgment for amount and costs 225. A. S. Easton v John Ryan,— Claim £30 2s 6d. Mr Baker for plaintiff. No appearance of defendant. Judgment for amount and costs, 44s Sol. fee 21s. E. S. Thynne v G N. Wood,— Claim 110 16s Mr Ray for plaintiff. No appearance of defendant. Judgment for amount with I costi 80s Sol. fee 2] s. H. Redfern v John Burke. No appear* anc« of either parties. CBIHIKAL, Henry Barber v Werata Kahoritf, H.tr* Ngatuhi, W. Hermard- Hote Hekecui and Renata Hekenui Mr Baker appeared for Rome of the defendants, and explained that he had received a letter from Mr Melliah Mr Baker's solicitor, that the proceeding* would ha abandoned- He asked that the oa « be adjourned to two o'clock to allow of Mr Morrison appearing. On the Court sitting at 2 p.m, Mr Morrison appeared on behalf of the defendants He applied for costs to cover expenees'. ilie case was dismissed with costs 21s,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH18901004.2.15
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, Volume III, Issue III, 4 October 1890, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
381Resident Magistrate's Court, Foxton. Manawatu Herald, Volume III, Issue III, 4 October 1890, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.