Resideat Magistrate's Court, Foxton.

Manawatu Herald, Volume II, Issue 277, 5 July 1889, Page 2

Resideat Magistrate's Court, Foxton.

"Wbdnesda* Jtod Jrax, / : <■ ;••■• (Before H. Brabant Esq. &£$ Gim oasis. , :A . C. W. Samuel v. H. I>. DarenjfctI Claim £2 4s 9d. Mr Matthew* apr peaied for plaintiff, ;' xws#sl&iMls l given by F. De Bidder tod 0, W. lamuel. There wm no appear*** of defendant;.. Wig* lll ! for amount claained wfut'tioiot 7|t OW. Samuel v- A. &.&*»> ' father-claim £2 7s 9d. _ JJir. Matthews appeared for plaintiff. No appearance of defendant. R de Bidder and 0. W. Samuel gy» =. evidence. Jndgment was given Jee.^ , amount claimed and costs Ts. . . * J. V. Rutherford v. T. Jones **£ Rogers, No appearance of defß*sr ants. Mr Matthews appdated *k plaintiff. Claim;£24%^*os^| r j ing and 8 day? W«f«- 1 .fwi 1 *!*? J!*r examined. Judging, $C ; JP9"m'olaimed as against tffi4tf^fljffts A» -„_. Jones, with coats 13i . „^' T ,' v OV.Furriev & Lr .Wfh son. Judgment sutqanone £1 10T lid. Mr Matthew^ tas judgment creditor, asked for^ari/ «% J»*f ■ amount be paid iaa montn, orjifual alternative made. M, Q. Wilbam- ' son did not put in an, *PP < ?f r «£& On the ground tha* the defenaran did not appear or afiwr good |*W for absei^it wiM^etal , taM*t»* . amount }# p»»*« ty k Wj, wy ** August^ Ibujf ? . r C. vjT. Swiu^ v^l*to\3^^.. , Claim £25 i*'. jft^^;jJ7**fWf"r ■ ' appeared for plai^Mt, .' '■*>■*'■ '*.Sv^" '- P. de Bidder depa&itM* .J^Jgi lately Manager *%*f#;§"~^ & Clo. The sum 'f^^f ' *t "Jf ! due for ■g^iAßMjjJ^pll^flifc; J%^ .^ By defenaaot-%. mtimk^^f the 4th Feb you got V feton: iffe , n , I do not know where jotk wi*» : pii ' April 3rd. I ! T do not know « I h4d * an order. I think all thei^ ' f0!^:\:---were got without an ordw,' .jfik v .,., lendant stated if aUertlMbjf W»j „ , made in s«cciunt' > '-irf!'':itett»»':Vl|f';W^iKj'.jected, he would admit refMwafir "#r debt. . • ; - ' ■.. '■ 'U /*f: .il.s^ ? C. W. Samuel depowd thi^^ W4 never received any mone^iM^ 4ev fendant. He had ren^r^ a. |tate- r ment of account, and it h** ipiewr been objected to. He never ofejacteT 'io bis father getti%"gdo#wh^i ' account. ' : ■ •-' ' . { ■"• l-;u'\\ .'• ■■•_ ' By defendant— l sett y«a a failiy average statement of acooUnii > John Burr on oath flta*f.d— rJ dispute the items rdetaikd, should havebeen sent o fkf W^aty person and then they . w?uj£ : ,p^.. 'been paid. o?be,itein4dispu*94.f^r# not all owing by my father. By Mr Matthews -It is not a f^oi that all goods ordered by my father were charged to me and paid for pjr me. A 1 goods hate been supplied to me or my order. The goods ob* 4. ieoted to, were not contained : iff -N*'A order. There were five order*.; I never gave my father an ordw. A There is a deed of partnership - \4± tween my father and myself; **A item of ten shillings was struck oafc and jodgment given 1 for plamtiff k . withcoatß. •' ' ■■"■■.'■■' ' er'-j'- 1 . Bawreti Ngawhena tv.Jß. 'Walden > -i-claim £Is. ' Mr Matthewti appeared for defendant, - . /,■■ Plaintiff teas unable; Jo find th# 10s hearing fee. Tbj R. i£ enquired, if the case was Wjournedto next court ty- would W.mßfiM ' able to fi»4iiiSif)lee, ? r p^, pja^ntit stated that he would hate the colt* - then. ..*' ' '.;. .,', ( '■ , ■/.'■' •' '"' ' 1 The case, ajouwed tt»- tflk of August. ' ' : _- -•'•■'•