VERDICT AGAINST BANK OF NEW ZEALAND.
- — - — ♦ — — ; — . The cases of the- Bank of New Zealand v. Wilson, Tame and Co, and the cross actions, are concluded, The bank claimed £2507 15s lid due on an overdraft and on bills. lathe cross-action, Wilson, Tame and Co* claimed £10,000 damages for injury to their credit through the bank naming dishonoured :their . cheques; toti-imX bKHight while their woo 1 account was in funds. The two actions were 1 for the sake of cdnveni* enee, heard at once. Mr Hagget, with Mr F. R. Chapman, appeared for the tank; Sir R. Stout, with. Mr J. McGwger, for Wilson, Tame and Co. The counsel addressed the jury, and Mr Justice Williams summed up, and the jury afterao absence of three hoars, returned a verdict giving Wilson, Ta : ne and Co. damages for £5000, the bank: getting a verdict in the other case. The bank will get altogether for the overdraft, overdue hills, etc; roughly about £3500, and Wilson, Tame and Co. therefore receive £1500.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH18890626.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, Volume II, Issue 274, 26 June 1889, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
168VERDICT AGAINST BANK OF NEW ZEALAND. Manawatu Herald, Volume II, Issue 274, 26 June 1889, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in