Resident Magistrate's Court, Foxton.
♦ ■'/■•" Wednesday, Mat 1, 1889. (Before H. W. Brabant, Esq. R.M.) The usual monthly sitting of the R.M Court was held on Wednesday. H. Bradcook y. E. Tamplin being a claim for 13s for board' and lodging was called on, and file defendant not appearing, judgment was given for plaintiff for amount cUintea and costs 15s. tllr "••■•■- J. E. Johnstou, Assignee of the book debts Dr DaWttpbrt v. W. Eeeve. Claim £l il tls 'WS Ur Matthews of the firm of Fitzherbert and Matthews; lappeaisd for the defendant. J. R. Johnston put- in the evidence taken at Hasting : W: S«er«
being sworn, said— -I am the defendant in this case. Dr Davenport did . not attend me on- 10th July nor on the 14th Juy. He was not in Foxton on those days. I deny being indebted for any amount beyond the sum paid into court. Gross examined by J. B. John-ston—-Th a Doctor never attended any of my family on those days. I. remember the date he attended my wife, it was on Sunday the Bth July. When I had the summons I referred ♦o|the almanac. The month iscorrect in the summons; July Bth was a Sunday. Dr Davenport came up twice. I paid 20s 6d into court for the amount. I admitted, owing 17a 6d and 3s for costs. I sent for th» Dr twice between the 10th and 14th. Re-examined by Mr Matthews— As a matter of fact I only owed the Ldoctor 17s 6d. j . /fh« question was proposed to bo settfaifyrv* -reference to the books, bat four- **»* a search stated he could find no entry, and then Mr Jonson had a «jr. ™J h % }$&* failing him, he placed *» **»& ™ the day book, but vegretfully inform** the court that he had a^o failed to fin* any entry. As Reeve had paid son™ money into court, judgment was en tered up foi that amount, costs of eacJi side to b« ( paid by each party. _ J, E. Johnston v. A. Joason. This was a claim for £1 10s 6vt medical attendance for his daughter. Mr Matthew appeared for the defendant . J. E. Johnston pot in some- evidence as taken at Hastings. . '■ .. Andrew Jonson swore I never in- < structed Dr Davenport to attend my daughter. I have never made mjself responsible. My daughter k over 21 years o' age. ■ , Cross examined -My daughter was within a few days of 21 w hen the doctor attended b«r. v She is about four months over 21 now. The attendance was in 1887. I" never told any person that J would pay the doctor for a portion of the • expenses incurred. I do not know where my daughter is now. "X The plaintiff was nonsuited. ._ J. E. Johnston v. T. LeerrP^P* *.l 10s. No appearance of defendant Judgment for plaintiff for amount claimed and costs 31s. • , . G. E." Williams v. Wi Kateue. Mr Hankins for defendant. Mr Matthews for plaintiff. This case was adjourned to the next sitting of the court op sth June.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH18890503.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, Volume VII, Issue 264, 3 May 1889, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
503Resident Magistrate's Court, Foxton. Manawatu Herald, Volume VII, Issue 264, 3 May 1889, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.