MS SNELSON AND MR HULKE'S CHARGES.
TO THK E3ITOB,or Tl l2 MVN'AW.— 'U HSUALJ' Sib, — 1 dosiro to draw tho atteutiou of th<settlers around Foxton. to the highly complimentary opinion 1 held of thorn. by Mr Siielson, who a short time ago desired to be their member in _c Hoaso of Representativea, as shown by iho report of his remarks and spe-ch ' at the last- meeting of the Wanganui Education Board Mr Snel son in moving the motion ■' That the charg- s brought by Mr Hulke against Mr F-iuliß hal not been pr-ov-n, and that tho Ho nrd sympathised' with MrFouHsin this enquiry," is ropoited to havo said that hi- " tii i -light the charges made a^iins t Mr i'ouli*j were frivolous in^the, He r^grottod liaving toma?— thVromartc, ljut to htui the demeanour of the' witnesses' pro-, duced" showed that thoy had been ttitoKiiV b'>foro!iaud." I take leave to challenge thi-i :i9;ertim of Mr Snelson's, and desire to characterise it as a gratuitous insult to three young girls who, Mr Shelson is pro'oabl - «ware, are not capable of 'eplying to him From my knowledge of v the. witnesses alluded to, I believo them to be perfectly honest and straif-htforwa'-d. Mr,. Snelsou \h:— further shown howhara it istooonvino. him ugainst his will in that he allowed him svlf to say that '*Mr Hiilko failed to prove '.hat ttu j sl'ires'had not been tampered with Rafter the marking" yet Mr Hulke handed ir affidavits fiom hiras-f, .that they had not been touched since the examination, and those from Messrs M'Cullocb and RockstroWy that the . slates were • marked iiU<fi-3ctly, ' "ToR he' * J pr*fttrea 1 to believe a statement made by th* Inspector, that most probably the boys had tampered with them. His choosing to disparage the written statement made by a number of the parents of children attending the sqhool j •ys being merely, hearsay- ; cvi • dence,' points to his "belief in — ther the children or the parents bein g . unable, to adhere to the truth.' '.".'" • • s ••* - He is further prepared to accept ns a fact, a statement made in a ■ private letter from Miss M'Phee to the Inspeotor, whioh is , contradictory of an affidavit uy_ .e by her and produced, and in direct contradiction to a statement made by her tp !tf r Stewart and - myself. ' Ido not think that it would bo possible for any man to make a more dear declaration ' ation of his bolief in the "g— leral meanness : aad untruthfulness of a body of settlers, than haß been made by Mr George Matthew Suelson. and I trust : the settlers tfill Mt the matter yet be further heard of. . I wonder whether it would be possible to discover why Mr Snelsoh holds such opin. ions now as he is reported to hold. ' I am, &c„ Ernest S. Thynshb. Foxton, July 3rd, 1880.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH18800706.2.11.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, Volume II, Issue 90, 6 July 1880, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
473MS SNELSON AND MR HULKE'S CHARGES. Manawatu Herald, Volume II, Issue 90, 6 July 1880, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.