Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POST-WAR PLANNING

ABVOCACY IN LORDS.

B.O.W.

RUGBY, Oct. 22.

A submission that machinery for national planning after the war should be settled now was made by Lord Reith, former Minister for Works and Buildings, when the House of Lords debated plans for post-war reconstruction to-day. Lord Reith called attention to the machinery of planning advocated in the Uthwatt and Seott reports and declared that it was quite impossible to wait until all points in those two reports had been studied and analysed and decisions taken thereon. He believed any machinery was better than none. It was impossible to separate social and economic planning from physical planning. Planning in both the social and economic spheres and also the physical sphere required inter-departmental machinery. Planning should not be the prerogative of any one department. Ultimately there should be one nondepartmental Minister of sufficient authority to be able to co-ordinate and reconcile the various departmental projects, and above all get things done. Lord Addison confessed that the long delay in setting up a central planning body for land control was very depressing, because it was evident that at the end of the war immense issues would thrust themseives upon Britain and it was impossible to think that any decisions could be reached unless a body of men long beforehand had given sustained thought to them. Lord Snell, for the Government, said it accepted the principle of planning. The proposals in the Scott and Uthwatt reports were being continuously studied. The Government was not prepared to announce a decision regarding them until their investigations were further advanced. Lord Snell said that the Government accepted the recommendation that the registration of the title to land should be made compulsory over the whole of England and Wales. The Lord Chancellor had appointed a committee to consider the recommendation. It would be presided over by Lord Rushcliffe.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MEX19421024.2.31.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Marlborough Express, Volume LXXVI, Issue 251, 24 October 1942, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
310

POST-WAR PLANNING Marlborough Express, Volume LXXVI, Issue 251, 24 October 1942, Page 5

POST-WAR PLANNING Marlborough Express, Volume LXXVI, Issue 251, 24 October 1942, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert