STRAYING STOCK
C0LLISI0N WITH MOTORS. QUESTION OF LIAB1LITY. SYDNEY, Aug. 26. Tlie claim with which one of the New South AVales shire councils has been eonfronted, for damages to a motor-car sustained through colliding with a calr wandering about on a road, opens up a question of in- - terest a-like to motorists and local 1 governing bodies. The helief that, in such a case, a oouncil is Ifable, becanse if it wore to im,poTini all stray stoek there would he none left upon the road, is, it iappears, quite wrong.
The point is emphasised hv one of Australia's Ieading authorities on local government that those who allow their stoek to stray are the wrongdoers, and that a claim upon a oouncil in such circumstances woind be no _more logioal than to hase one against the Crown in res]>ect of a burglary, on the ground that if the police had been a little more wide awake all the hurglars would be securely locked up. If, theiefore, a cow deelines to get out of the road of one's car and sometlnng happens. the owner of the car must call, if he seeks damages, ' not on the council , but on the owner 0f the errant cowI
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MEX19260928.2.74
Bibliographic details
Marlborough Express, Volume LX, Issue 229, 28 September 1926, Page 8
Word Count
203STRAYING STOCK Marlborough Express, Volume LX, Issue 229, 28 September 1926, Page 8
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Marlborough Express. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.