Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Resident Magistrate's Court.

BLENHEIM Monday, Eeb. 3, 1868. [Before S. L. Muller, Esq., K.M.] Do£>§ON V. STRATFORD. No appearance of the plaintiff. The case was struck'out. '• ; : " ■■*‘ ■■ PARKER V. MINCHIN. No appearance. PURKISS V. WATSON. Settled out of Court. ; . JAMES V, HEARS. . : ■ No appearance. ... ■ ’ ELBECK V. MINOGUE. .. v-• ■ An action to recover £24 19s. 6d., balance of account' due' for goods sold. 1 Herman Elbeck, a tobacconist in Blenheim, deposed that lie had asked defendant to settle the account,; but he had not paid it. He had supplied the goods himself, and at the.usual to withdraw one item of £3 which was ordered to be struck ,6'ut'by the Court, and judgment was giveu £2 Tss. costs,; withrimmediate execution,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MEX18680208.2.11

Bibliographic details

Marlborough Express, Volume III, Issue 100, 8 February 1868, Page 5

Word Count
117

Resident Magistrate's Court. Marlborough Express, Volume III, Issue 100, 8 February 1868, Page 5

Resident Magistrate's Court. Marlborough Express, Volume III, Issue 100, 8 February 1868, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert