Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Christchurch. January 6; 1859. (Before John Hall, Esq., R.M.) Alexander Selfe was fined 10s. for drunkenness. January 10. (Before W. G. Brittan, Esq., J : p.) , William Rogers was fined 10s. for drunkenness, and cautioned. January 12. . (Before John Hall, Esq., .8.M., and Joseph . Brittan, Esq., J.P.) BREACH OF SHEEP ORDINANCE.' John Carter, of the Waimakiriri, appeared/to answer a charge of non-registration of Sheep Brand, brought against Vim by Thos. K. Adams, Inspector of Sheep, Defendant stated that he was under the impression that his brand had been registered by Mr. Rowley. Convicted, firied;-£3 and costs. John Scott Cavorhill appeared to answer a similar charge preferred by T. X Adams, Inspector of Sheep. The inspector, stated on" oath, that he visited the Motimau Station on the' 17th of Dec. last, and found there 2000 sheep branded either LS.C. or J.S.C; upon examining. the Register of Brands in Christchurch, lie found neither brand had been registered up to that date. Georgo Turner, Registrar of Brands, produced the Register, and proved thafer ; no such brand as ISC or J S C had been registered prior to 10th of January, 1859. Defendant stated that when he was fined for the same offence upon a prior occasion, he handed over an impression of his brand with the register fee to mi m" Con Sreve>tlien Registrar of Brands. The Court observed that, as the case stood before them, there was no reason why the full penalty of the law should not be inflicted, as the oflcnco wav clearly proved; and that if dofendant could substantiate what he had stated respecting his having already registered his brand ho might then recover damages from tho person then holding the office of Registrar, by the usual remedy at law. Convicted and fined £5.

ACTION FOR DEBT , Bishop v. Day: No appearance of dofendnnt, Judgment recorded for plaintiff for £9 16 S . 9d ana costs.

Bishop v. Ashby : a similar case; no -appearance of defendant. Judgment recorded for plaintiff f w £20, the amount claimed, and costs. PBOVINCIATj TJKEABUBER V. GEOBGE HULCUp. Tin's was an action to recover the sum of ,£}() 10a. duo on a bill of exchange, drawn by G. H u |, cup and accepted by Angus McDonald, for an as. sisted passage from England. Plaintiff produced a written undertaking on the part of defendant's wif e .to'meet the above mentioned bill when due. Xliq bill had not been paid, and it was on this under. taking on the part of defendant's wife that plaintiff claimed the amount due. Defendant did not an. pear. Judgment was recorded for plaintiff for tl, e amount claimed and coats.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/LT18590115.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Lyttelton Times, Volume XI, Issue 640, 15 January 1859, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
440

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Lyttelton Times, Volume XI, Issue 640, 15 January 1859, Page 4

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Lyttelton Times, Volume XI, Issue 640, 15 January 1859, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert